PUBLIC MEETING ON ’CHANGE,
IN REFERENCE TO THE POST-OFFICE DEPARTMENT.
The meeting at the Exchange, called for by a numerously signed advertisement in the
papers for some days past, to consider the following facts, assembled at 2 o’clock,
yesterday:
“The Great Southern Mail, from New Orleans to this city, and from this city back to
New Orleans, is regularly about three business days behind the Private Expresses,—mainly
because the Postmaster General, either from indisposition or inability, (as he alleges,
under the law,) refuses to keep up with the competition.
“The Southern Mail, also, which leaves here at 4 ½ o’clock P. M., and which therefore
carries out all business operations of the day, lies overall night in Philadelphia.”
Jas G King & Sons, | Thos P Gustin, Jr, | N L & G Griswold, |
Nevins & Townsend, | Joseph E Trippe, | Gilmore & Logan, |
Goodhue & Co, | Robert Bage, | Tucker, Cooper & Co, |
Bogert & Kneeland, | A & R Waller, | John Murray, |
Suydam, Sage & Co, | A B Mason, | Jas M Hicks, |
Fox & Livingston, | J H Rickett; | C A Ten Eyck, |
Aymar & Co, | Dwight & Jones, | Olney & Correll, |
Camman & Co | Wilmot Williams, | Hussey & Murray, |
Allen & Paxson, | John Oakes, | Russell & Cepland, |
Nesmith & Co, | Wm R Dwight, | Frost & Hicks, |
W W DeForest & Co, | Joseph A Dunn, | Charles Felch, |
Townsend & Brooks, | Wm Kerr, | Badger, Peck & Co |
Seger & West, | Ludlam & Langely, | Boonen & Graves, |
Wm G West, | C F Parooh & Co, | G & S Wheelwright, |
Gault, Ballard & Co, | Baker & Cooke, | Thomas S Simms, |
Joseph Goddard, | John Power, | James Smith, |
J Van Namee & Co, | W B & T M Dougherty, | Sturges & Clearman, |
A & A G Trask, | A Hemp, | |
Geo Bell, | E Corning & Son, | Buckley & Lockwood |
A Foster & Sons, | J How[a?]rd & Son, | Keimeth & Laverty |
Olyphant & Son, | Jno C Green, | John P Elwell, |
M Ford, | Wm C Esart, | F Pentz, |
Wa[l?]ter E Harding, | P Wells & Co, | O Cammann, |
Hinsdale & Case, | Phelps, Crittenden & Bliss, | John J Palmer, |
Stephen S Clark, | A P Halsey, | |
Cogswell & Crane, | Atwater, Gould & Co, | D Leavitt, |
Clark, Fisk & Co, | Hunt, Kendall & Atwater, | F J Hosford, |
C R Degen, | F H & D Lathrop, | |
Jas R Hitchcock, | Hiram Dixon, | Theo B Lawshuate, |
R Ransom, | Adams & Co, | John J Fisk, |
W Seaman, | S J Edwards, | N G Rutgers, |
James H Dill, | John S Stinson, | D B Turner, |
Jas Cronkright, | Jas M Hill, | M Tucker, |
A G Benson & Co, | Chas W Weed, | J S Clark, |
Jackson & Robins, | J Conner, | Jas Richmond, |
Gilbert A Grant, | M Weed, | Gilbert, Cobb & Johnson, |
Wm Lawson, | F Dobbs, | |
J Anderson & Co, | R Withers, | Jos Drake, |
John Spader, | Van Renssalaer Van Courtland, | W S Nichols, |
J McGregor, | G A Worth, | |
Blake & Coolidge, | George Curtis, | H Leonard, |
Harnden & Co, | H D Townsend, | P R Kearney, |
Isaac Kip, Jr, | Jno S Tappan, | D Sayre, |
Derw, Robinson & Co, | James Wright, | D White, |
John G Winter, | W W Dibblee, | J Shaw, |
J T Vanderhoof, | J Lahens & Co, | A S Foster, |
N D Morgan, | Wm M Parks, | E T Richardson, |
Avery & Lyman, | Girarous Clark, | D R Peck, |
J J Dickinson, | Draper & Glover, | Jas Williamson, |
A R Wyckoff, | Rion W Boane, | G W Randolph & Co, |
Clark, Dodge & Co | T W Thomas, | F T James, |
Fred A Delano, | J B Collins, | Edw Corning, |
Chas A Heckscher, | M Robinson, | L Phillips, |
H B Robinson, | W B Kellogg, | S W Thompson, |
Zebedee Cook, | Abm G Thompson, | E D James, |
Chas Towns, | Morris Frank[l?]in, | Benj S Whitney, |
Joseph Strong, | Cor[e?] & Smith, | E H Mansfield, |
T Sweeny, | H T Kimball, | J W McLean, |
M B Edgar, | R Havens, |
The meeting was numerously attended, and
James G. King, Esq., called the meeting to order, and nominated
Stewart Brown, Esq., for Chairman.
Wm. B. Townsend and F. M. Babcock, Esqs., were nominated as Secretaries.
The following memorial being offered, it was then read by Mr. Townsend:
Memorial [t?]o the Senate an[d] House of Representatives, of the United States:
The Merchants of New York and others respectfully represent to the Congress of the
United States, that, in all our business transactions, with New Orleans and other
Southern cities, we labor under great and serious embarrassment in consequence of
the extraordinary delays and derangements of the mails.
The great mail from this city should leave New York every evening at an hour sufficiently
late to take from this commercial capital all the business transactions of the day,
and then be hurried on South and West with all the rapidity of steam power, and on
account of its vast importance to all classes of our fellow citizens, without an over-nice
regard to expense; whereas now this great mail is delayed a whole night in Philadelphia.
This mail, too, when it leaves this city, should seek the shortest and most certain
routes Southward; whereas nowd o1 the cost and delay of a whole business day, it seeks the circuitous route of Chesapeake
Bay and James river, in Virginia.
Again, the Post Office Department, without regard to expense, should never suffer
private competition to beat, day after day, and regularly, its own Government mails.
For the consequence of such a state of things is to make the whole commercial and
agricultural community the prey of speculation. Occasional triumphs of private competition
over the Government mails are perhaps unavoidable; but when they become systematic
and regular the Post Office Department not only loses its utility to the Public, but
becomes a positive injury: First, from the dangerous reliance that may be put upon
its anticipated markets and prices, and Second, from I[t]s being a monopoly against whi[c]h we are not allowed, by law, to organize a systematic competition.
It is not for us, business men as we are, to enter upon, or enquire into, the causes
of these delays and injuries to us, for that we cheerfully refer to the consideration
of your honorable bodies; but we respectfully urge the application of an immediate
remedy, or an entire repeal, on this great Southern route, of all laws forbidding
the establishment of Private mails, so that we can protect ourselves from the evils
under which we now suffer. We are satisfied that we ourselves can organize, on this
great route, a mail which shall gain THREE DAYS upon the existing mail transportation,
and also reduce the p[o]stages. But we have no desire to engage in any such undertaking, if Congress or the
Postmaster General will exercise the Constitutional powers of the Government, and
save us from speculation, or misinformation, to which we are now daily subject; when,
on the most important mail route of the Union. every Atlantic city is at the mercy of a few, who alone have the sources of iuformation.
Entertaining such views as these, which might be greatly enlarged upon, we submit
the following resolutions:
First That the proceedings of this meeting be presented to each House of Congress, to the
President of the Unit[e]d States and the Postmaster General.
Second That their early and immediate attention be invited to this important subject.
Hon John Barney, of Baltimore, asked leave, through a stranger, to offer the following
resolution:—
“Resolved, That the Congress of the United States be respectfully reminded of the fact that
the public faith was pledged, by repeated declarations, that while doubting the Constitutional
power to aid in contracting Railroads by direct subscription to the capital stock,
ample remuneration would be made to the patriotic stockholders by liberal contracts
and allowances for carrying the mails, transporting troops, munitions of war,” &c.,
&c.
The Chair manifesting some signs of dissatisfaction with the introduction of a resolution
not relating to the purposes for whieh the meeting was called,
Mr. Barney, in a few words, urged the adoption of this resolution, on the ground that
Congress, in 1827, implied a pledge to the projectors of railroads, that the country
would use them for such purposes. He was a member of that Congress, and it was sustained
by, among others, that great stickler for State rights, John Randolph. He dwelt at
some length upon some points, to show that the Post-Office Department ought to deal
liberally with railroads.
James G. King, Esq., thought that, however good the argument might be, it was not
necessary to adopt the resolution, or to discuss it, at this time. It might be urged
on Congress with effect, but the present object was expedition to the mails,—and it
was only for this purpose that the meeting was called. It mattered not to the merchants
how the mail came, if it came as quick as possible, and was not anticipated by other
people.
Mr. Barney then withdrew his resolution.
The memorial was adopted without a dissenting voice, and the meeting, on motion, adjourned.
<Page 2>
[ docketing
]
S John
[ docketing
]
Memorial of Merchants & other Citizens of New-York on the subject of expediting the
Mails.
[ docketing
]
December 27, 1847, Referred to the Committee on Post offices & Post Roads
[ docketing
]
Presented by Mr Tallmadge of New York
[ docketing
]
Refer to Com on Post office & Post Roads.
[ docketing
]
Tallmadge
Printed Document, 2 page(s), RG 233, Entry 367: Records of the U.S. House of Representatives, Thirtieth Congress, 1847-1849, Records of Legislative Proceedings, Petitions and Memorials, Resolutions of State Legislatures, and Related Documents Which Were Referred to Committees, 1847-1849, NAB