In force, Feb.[February] 1, 1842.
An ACT regulating evidence in certain cases.
1
In trials on contracts, not necessary to prove partnership
Proviso.
Sec. 1. Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, represented in the General Assembly, That in trials of actions upon contracts, express or implied, where the action is brought by partners or by joint payees or obligees, it shall not be necessary for the plaintiff, in order to maintain any such action, to prove the copartnership of the individuals named in such action, or to prove the christain or sir names of such partners, or joint payees or obligees, but the names of such copartners, joint payees or obligees shall be presumed to be truly set forth in the declaration, petition or bill: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall prevent the defendant in any such action from pleading in abatement as heretofore, or of proving on the trial either that more persons ought to have been plantiffs, or that more persons have been made plaintiffs than have a legal right to sue, or that the christian or sir name is other and different from the one stated in the declaration, petition or bill, in which event the defendants’ rights shall be as at common law.

<Page 2>
Proof of liability not required.
Act repealed.
Sec. 2. On actions upon contracts, express or implied, against two or more defendants, alleged to have been made or executed by such defendants, as partners or joint obligors or payors, proof of the joint liability or partnership of the defendants, or their christian or sir names, shall not in the first instance be required to entitle the plaintiff to judgment, unless such proof shall be rendered necessary by pleading in abatement, or the filing of pleas denying the execution of such writing, verified by affidavit, as is required by the “Act concerning practice in courts of law,” approved on the twenty-ninth day of January, one thousand eight hundred and twenty-seven.2 The act entitled “An act regulating evidence in certain cases,” approved, March second, one thousand eight hundred and thirty-nine, be and the same is hereby repealed, and this act to be in force from and after the first day of February next.
Approved, February 17, 1841.
1On January 15, 1841, John Pearson introduced SB 115 in the Senate. The Senate referred the bill to the Committee on the Judiciary. The Committee on the Judiciary reported back the bill on January 22 with an amendment, in which the Senate concurred. On January 25, the Senate passed the bill as amended. On February 12, the House of Representatives referred the bill to the Committee on the Judiciary. The Committee on the Judiciary reported back the bill on February 15, recommending its rejection. The House refused to read the bill a third time. On February 16, the House reported this decision to the Senate, which nevertheless enrolled the bill and sent it to the Council of Revision for approval. On February 17, the Council approved the bill and the act became law.
Illinois House Journal. 1840. 12th G. A., 286, 305, 381, 400; Illinois Senate Journal. 1840. 12th G. A., 168, 190, 207, 323, 328, 336.
2“An Act concerning Practice in Courts of Law,” 29 January 1827, The Revised Code of Laws, of Illinois (1827), 310-19.

Printed Document, 2 page(s), Laws of the State of Illinois, Passed by the Twelfth General Assembly (Springfield, IL: William Walters, 1841), 112-13, GA Session 12-2,