Report of Legislative Proceeding regarding the Salary of a Judge of Western District
               in Virginia, 28 June 1848
            
            Mr. LINCOLN said, he felt unwilling to be either unjust or ungenerous, and he wanted to understand
               the real case of this judicial officer. The gentleman from Virginia had stated that he had to hold eleven courts. Now, everybody knew that it was not
               the habit of the district judges of the United States in other States to hold anything
               like that number of courts; and he therefore took it for granted that this must happen
               under a peculiar law, which required that large number of courts to be holden every
               year; and these laws, he further supposed, were passed at the request of the people
               of that judicial district. It came, then, to this: that the people in the western
               district of Virginia had got eleven courts to be held among them in one year, for their own accommodation;
               and being thus better accommodated than their neighbors elsewhere, they wanted their
               judge to be a little better paid. In Illinois, there had been, until the present season, but one district court held in the year.
               There were now to be two. Could it be that the western district of Virginia furnished
               more business for a judge than the whole State of Illinois?1
         1Abraham Lincoln made these remarks in the context of a debate over H.R. No. 290, introduced
                  by Richard K. Meade on March 2, 1848, “to change the times for holding the district courts of the United
                  States in the western district of Virginia, and for other purposes.”  At issue was
                  section three of the bill, which increased the salary of the judge from $1,600 to
                  $2,500.  Prior to Lincoln’s remarks, members of the House of Representatives objected to the salary increase and had voted to strike out the third section by
                  a vote of 118 yeas to thirty-nine nays, with Lincoln voting yea.  Meade urged the
                  House to reconsider, asking that the bill be committed to the Committee on the Judiciary
                  with a recommendation that the salary be set at $2,000.  Meade defended the salary
                  increase, citing the excessive labor and travel involved.  Lincoln spoke in response
                  to Meade’s contentions.  The House ultimately tabled Meade’s request for reconsideration
                  and passed the bill as amended.  The Senate passed the bill with an amendment setting the salary at $2,000, which the House did
                  not approve, leading to a committee of conference, which recommended adoption of the
                  Senate amendment.  The House tabled the committee of conference report without further
                  action.   
                  
         H.R. 290, 30th Cong. (1848); Cong. Globe, 30th Cong., 1st Sess., 877-78 (1848); U.S. House Journal. 1848. 30th Cong., 1st sess., 484, 968-69, 1203-4, 1237, 1239-40, 1267, 1283; Roy
                     P. Basler, ed., The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953), 1:494-95.
                  
                                    Printed Document,  1 page(s),  Cong. Globe, 30th Cong., 1st Sess., 878 (1848).