Abraham Lincoln to Hezekiah M. Wead, 7 February 18521
H. M. Wead, Esq[Esquire]Dear Sir—
Your letter enclosing ten dollars was received today.2 I have just called on Logan and he tells me they have paid the costs and will take a new trial— Be sure, therefore to send the brief, with the authorities on it— It might be well for you to re-record your old deed from the patentee, with the new certificate in it—3
Yours trulyA. Lincoln.
1This letter is attributed to Abraham Lincoln, but the original document in his hand has not been located.
2Hezekiah M. Wead’s letter to Lincoln has not been located.
3This is a reference to the legal case Smith v. Gardner, which was an ejectment case that began trial at the U.S. Circuit Court, District of Illinois on January 20, 1852. In American law, “ejectment” relates to an action to recover land or other real property and to collect damages. Originally, in the English common law, only tenants could use this action to recover possession of land from which they had been unlawfully ousted. Because of the simplicity and swiftness of the ejectment procedure, landowners began to use this action to recover land. To do so, the landowner, on behalf of a fictitious tenant (John Doe), sued a fictitious defendant (Richard Roe) for ousting the fictitious tenant. The court titled such cases John Doe ex dem. “Landowner” v. Richard Roe. When the defendant appeared in court, the clerk sometimes replaced “Richard Roe” with the defendant’s real name. In an act passed in March 1839, the Illinois General Assembly abolished the need for the fictitious names. The losing party in an ejectment case was entitled by law to one new trial simply by paying the court costs.
Lincoln, Wead, and Orville H. Browning served as attorneys for the plaintiff, Spencer Smith, and Stephen T. Logan served as attorney for James Gardner, the defendant. At the heart of the suit was a dispute over Gardner’s occupation of 160 acres of land in Fulton County, Illinois, land over which Smith claimed ownership and from which he wanted Gardner ejected. The original case was decided on January 26, 1852. Judge Thomas Drummondruled for Smith. The court determined that Gardner’s deed of August 1820 did not take precedence over Smith’s deed of January 1820 because, despite being recorded “defectively” in June 1820, Smith’s deed was “cured,” or made official, by an act in 1822 concerning deeds.
Gardner subsequently paid the court costs, entitling him to a new trial, which Logan requested on January 27, 1852. Eventually, on February 1, 1853, the case was once again decided in favor of Smith.
Complete Record, Document ID: 68744; Execution Docket, Document ID: 65797, Smith v. Gardner, Martha L. Benner and Cullom Davis et al., eds., The Law Practice of Abraham Lincoln: Complete Documentary Edition, 2d edition (Springfield: Illinois Historic Preservation Agency, 2009), http://www.lawpracticeofabrahamlincoln.org/Details.aspx?case=137716; “Ejectment,” Reference, Glossary, Martha L. Benner and Cullom Davis et al., eds., The Law Practice of Abraham Lincoln: Complete Documentary Edition, http://www.lawpracticeofabrahamlincoln.org/Reference.aspx?ref=Reference%20html%20files/Glossary.html; Abraham Lincoln to Orville H. Browning; “An Act Concerning Deeds Executed Without this State,” 30 December 1822, Laws of Illinois (1822), 85-86.

Printed Transcription, 1 page(s), Emanuel Hertz, Abraham Lincoln: A New Portrait (New York: Horace Liveright, 1931), 2:610.