The separate answer of David C. Goodin to a Bill in chancery exhibited in the Christian circuit court, by James Young against this Respondent & others–2

This Respondent, saving, reserving &c.[etc.] for answer to said Bill, or to so much thereof as he is advised it is material for him to answer unto, answering, says, that the whole of said Bill, and the allegations thereof may be true, for ought he knows; and he there fore admits the same, with the exceptions herein after, appearing– He denies that he has been fully paid, by the said Hardin for the Lot and appurtenances, in said Bill mentioned; but, on the contrary, he alleges that the said Hardin was, by the contract to pay him the sum of three hundred and fifty dollars, for said Lot & appurtenances, and that two hundred and thirty ^sixtyfive ^ dollars only, thereof has ever been paid him leaving still due him, this Respondent, the sum of one hundred and twenty ^eightyfive ^ dollars, & interest– Respondent also denies, that he ever contracted to pay to said Hanon any thing whatever, in connection with said Lot– He states that after he purchased said Lot &c. of said Matthews, he did ^through said Hardin ^ upon the order of said Matthews; pay to said Hanon, the sum of fortyfive dollars; and that that is the only trans transaction relative to said Lot, that he has had with said Hanon– And now having fully answered, he prays to be hence discharged with his costs–3