Report of Address Before the Young Men’s Lyceum of Springfield, Illinois, 27 January
18381
THE PERPETUATION OF OUR POLITICAL INSTITUIONS.
Young Men’s Lyceum,Springfield, Jan. 27 1837.2
“Resolved, That the thanks of this Lyceum be presented to A. Lincoln, Esq.[Esquire] for the Lecture delivered by kim[him] this evening, and that he be solicited to furnish a copy for publication.”
Attest;
Jas. H. Matheny, Sec’y.[Secretary]As a subject for the remarks of the evening, the perpetuation of our political institutions, is selected.
In the great journal of things happening under the sun, we, the American People, find
our account running, under date of the nineteenth century of the Christian era.—We
find ourselves in the peaceful possession, of the fairest portion of the earth, as
regards extent of territory, fertility of soil, and salubrity of climate. We find
ourselves under the government of a system of political institutions, conducing more
essentially to the ends of civil and religious liberty, than any of which the history
of former times tells us. We, when mounting the stage of existence, found ourselves
the legal inheritors of these fundamental blessings. We toiled not in the acquirement
or establishment of them—they are a legacy bequeathed us, by a once hardy, brave, and patriotic, but now lamented and departed race of ancestors. Their’s was the task (and nobly they performed
it) to possess themselves, and through themselves, us, of this goodly land; and to
uprear upon its hills and its valleys, a political edifice of liberty and equal rights;
’tis ours only, to transmit these, the former, unprofaned by the foot of an invader;
the latter, undecayed by the lapse of time, and untorn . . . [by usurpation—to the latest generation that fate shall permit the world to know.
This task of gratitude to our fathers, justice to ourselves, duty to posterity]3, and love for our species in general, all imperatively require us faithfully to perform.
How, then, shall we perform it?—At what point shall we expect the approach of danger?
By what means shall we fortify against it?—Shall we expect some transatlantic military
giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never!—All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military
chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander,4 could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years.
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever
reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction
be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen,
we must live through all time, or die by suicide.
I hope I am over wary; but if I am not, there is, even now, something of ill-omen,
amongst us. I mean the increasing disregard for law which pervades the country; the
growing disposition to substitute the wild and furious passions, in lieu of the sober
judgement of Courts; and the worse than savage mobs, for the executive ministers of justice.
This disposition is awfully fearful in any community; and that it now exists in ours,
though grating to our feelings to admit, it would be a violation of truth, and an
insult to our inteligence, to deny. Accounts of outrages committed by mobs, form the every day news of the
times. They have pervaded the country, from New England to Louisiana;—they are neither peculiar to the eternal snows of the former, nor the burning suns
of the latter;—they are not the creature of climate—neither are they confined to the
slave-holding, or the non-slave-holding States. Alike, they spring up among the pleasure
hunting masters of Southern slaves, and the order loving citizens of the land of steady
habits.—Whatever, then, their cause may be, it is common to the whole country.5
It would be tedious, as well as useless, to recount the horrors of all of them. Those
happening in the State of Mississippi, and at St. Louis, are, perhaps, the most dangerous in example, and revolting to humanity. In the
Mississippi case, they first commenced by hanging the regular gamblers; a set of
men, certainly not following for a livelihood, a very useful, or very honest occupation;
but one which, so far from being forbidden by the laws, was actually lisensed by an act of the Legislature, passed but a single year before. Next, negroes, suspected of conspiring to raise
an insurrection, were caught up and hanged in all parts of the State: then, white
men, supposed to be leagued with the negroes; and finally, strangers, from neighboring
States, going thither on business, were, in many instances, subjected to the same
fate. Thus went on this process of hanging, from gamblers to negroes, from negroes
to white citizens, and from these to strangers; till, dead men were seen literally
dangling from the boughs of trees upon every road side; and in numbers almost sufficient,
to rival the native Spanish moss of the country, as a drapery of the forest.6
Turn, then, to that horror-striking scene at St. Louis. A single victim was only
sacrificed there. His story is very short; and is, perhaps, the most highly tragic,
of any thing of its length, that has ever been witnessed in real life. A mulatto
man, by the name of McIntosh, was seized in the street, dragged to the suburbs of the city, chained to a tree,
and actually burned to death; and all within a single hour from the time he had been
a freeman, attending to his own business, and at peace with the world.7
Such are the effects of mob law; and such are the scenes, becoming more and more frequent
in this land so lately famed for love of law and order; and the stories of which,
have even now grown too familiar, to attract any thing more, than an idle remark.
But you are, perhaps, ready to ask, “What has this to do with the perpetuation of
our political institutions?” I answer, it has much to do with it. Its direct consequences
are, comparatively speaking, but a small evil; and much of its danger consists, in
the proneness of our minds, to regard its direct, as its only consequences. Abstractly
considered, the hanging of the gamblers at Vicksburg, was of but little consequence. They constitute a portion of population, that is
worse than useless in a . . .[ny community; and their death, if no pernicious]8 example be set by it, is never matter of reasonable regret with any one. If they
were annually swept, from the stage of existence, by the plague or small pox, honest
men would, perhaps, be much profited, by the operation.—Similar too, is the correct
reasoning, in regard to the burning of the negro at St. Louis. He had forfeited his
life, by the perpetration of an outrageous murder, upon one of the most worthy and
respectable citizens of the city; and had he not died as he did, he must have died
by the sentence of the law, in a very short time afterwards. As to him alone, it
was as well the way it was, as it could otherwise have been.—But the example in either
case, was fearful.—When men take it in their heads to day, to hang gamblers, or burn
murderers, they should recollect, that, in the confusion usually attending such transactions,
they will be as likely to hang or burn some one, who is neither a gambler nor a murderer
[as] one who is; and that, acting upon the [example] they set, the mob of tomorrow, may, and probably will, hang or burn some of them,
[by the]9 very same mistake. And not only so; the innocent, those who have ever set their faces
against violations of law in every shape, alike with the guilty, fall victims to the
ravages of mob law; and thus it goes on, step by step, till all the walls erected
for the defence of the persons and property of individuals, are trodden down, and disregarded. But
all this even, is not the full extent of the evil.—By such examples, by instances
of the perpetrators of such acts going unpunished, the lawless in spirit, are encouraged
to become lawless in practice; and having been used to no restraint, but dread of
punishment, they thus become, absolutely unrestrained.—Having ever regarded Government
as their deadliest bane, they make a jubilee of the suspension of its operations;
and pray for nothing so much, as its total annihilation. While, on the other hand,
good men, men who love tranquility, who desire to abide by the laws, and enjoy their
benefits, who would gladly spill their blood in the defence of their country; seeing their property destroyed; their families insulted, and their
lives endangered; their persons injured; and seeing nothing in prospect that forebodes
a change for the better; become tired of, and disgusted with, a Government that offers
them no protection; and are not much averse to a change in which they imagine they
have nothing to lose. Thus, then, by the operation of this mobocratic spirit, which
all must admit, is now abroad in the land, the strongest bulwark of any Government,
and particularly of those constituted like ours, may effectually be broken down and
destroyed—I mean the attachment of the People. Whenever this effect shall be produced among us; whenever the vicious
portion of population shall be permitted to gather in bands of hundreds and thousands,
and burn churches, ravage and rob provision stores, throw printing presses into rivers,
shoot editors,10 and hang and burn obnoxious persons at pleasure, and with impunity; depend on it,
this Government cannot last. By such things, the feelings of the best citizens will
become more or less alienated from it; and thus it will be left without friends, or
with too few, and those few too weak, to make their friendship effectual. At such
a time and under such circumstances, men of sufficient ta[lent] . . . [and ambition will not be wanting] to seize . . . [the opportunity, strike the blow, and overturn that fair fabric]11, which for the last half century, has been the fondest hope, of the lovers of freedom,
throughout the world.
I know the American People are much attached to their Government;—I know they would suffer much for its sake;—I know they would endure evils long and patiently, before they would
ever think of exchanging it for another. Yet, notwithstanding all this, if the laws
be continually despised and disregarded, if their rights to be secure in their persons
and property, are held by no better tenure than the caprice of a mob, the alienation
of their affections from the Government is the natural consequence; and to that, sooner
or later, it must come.
Here then, is one point at which danger may be expected.
The question recurs “how shall we fortify against it?” The answer is simple. Let
every American, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear
by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country; and never to
tolerate their violation by others. As the patriots of seventy-six did to the support
of the Declaration of Independence, so to the support of the Constitution and Laws,
let every American pledge his life, his property, and his sacred honor;—let every
man remember that to violate the law, is to trample on the blood of his father, and
to tear the character of his own, and his children’s liberty. Let reverence for the
laws, be breathed by every American mother, to the lisping babe, that prattles on
her lap—let it be taught in schools, in seminaries, and im colleges;—let it be written in Primmers, spelling books, and in Almanacs;—let it
be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislative halls, and enforced in courts
of justice. And, in short, let it become the political religion of the nation; and let the old and the young, the rich and the poor, the grave and
the gay, of all sexes and tongues, and colors and conditions, sacrifice unceasingly
upon its altars.
While ever a state of feeling, such as this, shall universally, or even, very generally
prevail throughout the nation, vain will be every effort, and fruitless every attempt,
to subvert our national freedom.
When I so pressingly urge a strict observance of all the laws, let me not be understood
as saying there are no bad laws; nor that grievances may not arise, for the redress
of which, no legal provisions have been made.—I mean to say no such thing. But I
do mean to say, that, although bad laws, if they exist, should be repealed as soon
as possible, still while they continue in force, for the sake of example, they should
be religiously observed. So also in unprovided cases. If such arise, let proper
legal provisions be made for them with the least possible delay; but, till then, let
them if not too intolerable, be borne with.
There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law. In any case that
arises, as for instance, the promulgation of abolitionism, one of two positions is necessarily true; that is, the thing is right within itself,
and therefore deserves the protection of all law and all good citizens; or, it is
wrong, and therefore proper to be prohibited by legal enactments; and in neither case,
is the interposition of mob law, either necessary, justifiable, or excusable.
But, it may be asked, why suppose danger to our political institutions? Have we not
preserved them for more than fifty years? And why may we not for fifty times as long?
We hope there is no sufficient reason. We hope all dangers may be overcome; but to conclude that no danger may
ever arise, would itself be extremely dangerous. There are now, and will hereafter
be, many causes, dangerous in their tendency, which have not existed heretofore; and
which are not too insignificant to merit attention. That our government should have
been maintained in its original form from its establishment until now, is not much
to be wondered at. It had many props to support it through that period, which now
are now decayed, and crumbled away. Through that period, it was felt by all, to be
an undecided experiment; now, it is understood to be a successful one.—Then, all that
sought celebrity and fame, and distinction, expected to find them in the success of
that experiment. Their all was staked upon it:—their destiny was inseparably linked with it. Their ambition aspired to display before an admiring world, a practical
demonstration of the truth of a proposition, which had hitherto been considered, at
best no better, than problematical; namely, the capability of a people to govern themselves. If they succeeded, they were to be immortalized: their names were to be transferred
to counties and cities, and rivers and mountains; and to be revered and sung, and
toasted through all time. If they failed, they were to be called knaves and fools,
and fanatics for a fleeting hour; then to sink and be forgotten. They succeeded.
The experiment is successful; and thousands have won their deathless names in making
it so. But the game is caught; and I believe it is true, that with the crtching[catching], end the pleasures of the chase. This field of glory is harvested, and the crop
is already appropriated. But new reapers will arise, and they, too, will seek a field. It is to deny, what the history of the world tells us is
true, to suppose that men of ambition and talents will not continue to spring up amongst
us. And, when they do, they will as naturally seek the gratification of their ruling
passion, as others have so done before them. The question then, is, can that gratification be found in supporting
and maintaining an edifice that has been erected by others? Most certainly it cannot.
Many great and good men sufficiently qualified for any task they should undertake,
may ever be found, whose ambition would aspire to nothing beyond a seat in Congress, a gubernatorial or a presidential chair; but such belong not to the family of the lion, or the tribe of the eagle, What! think you these places would satisfy an Alexander, a Caesar, or a Napoleon?12—Never! Towering genius disdains a beaten path. It seeks regions hitherto unexplored.—It
sees no distinction in adding story to story, upon the monuments of fame, erected to the memory of others.
It denies that it is glory enough to serve under any chief. It scorns to tread in the footsteps of any predecessor, however illustrious. It thirsts and burns for distinction; and, if
possible, it will have it, whether at the expense of emancipating slaves, or enslaving
freemen. Is it unreasonable then to expect, that some man possessed of the loftiest
genius, coupled with ambition sufficient to push it to its utmost stretch, will at
some time, spring up among us? And when such a one does, it will require the people
to be united with each other, attached to the government and laws, and generally intelligent,
to successfully frustrate his designs.
Distinction will be his paramount object; and although he would as willingly, perhaps
more so, acquire it by doing good as harm; yet, that opportunity being past, and nothing
left to be done in the way of building up, he would set boldly to the task of pulling
down.
Here then, is a probable case, highly dangerous, and such a one as could not have
well existed heretofore.
Another reason which once was; but which, to the same extent, is now no more, has done much in maintaining our institutions thus far. I mean the powerful influence
which the interesting scenes of the revolution had upon the passions of the people as distinguished from their judgment. By this influence, the jealousy,
envy, and avarice, incident to our nature, and so common to a state of peace, prosperity,
and conscious strength, were, for the time, in a great measure smothered and rendered
inactive; while the deep rooted principles of hate, and the powerful motive of revenge, instead of being turned against each other, were directed exclusively against the
British nation. And thus, from the force of circumstances, the basest principles
of our nature, were either made to lie dormant, or to become the active agents in
the advancement of the noblest of cause—that of establishing and maintaining civil
and religious liberty.
But this state of feeling must fade, is fading, has faded, with the circumstances that produced it.
I do not mean to say, that the scenes of the revolution are now or ever will be entirely forgotten; but that like every thing else, they must fade upon the memory
of the world, and grow more and more dim by the lapse of time. In history, we hope,
they will be read of, and recounted, so long as the bible shall be read;—but even
granting that they will, their influence cannot be what it heretofore has been. Even then, they cannot be so universally known, nor so vividly felt, as they were by the generation just gone
to rest. At the close of that struggle, nearly every adult male had been a participator
in some of its scenes. The consequence was, that of those scenes, in the form of
a husband, a father, a son or a brother, a living history was to be found in every family—a history bearing the indubitable testimonies of
its own authenticity, in the limbs mangled, in the scars of wounds received, in the
midst of the very scenes related—a history, too, that could be read and understood
alike by all, the wise and the ignorant, the learned and the unlearned.—But those histories are gone. They can be read no more forever. They were a fortress of strength; but, what invading foemen could never do, the silent artillery of time has done; the levelling of its walls. They are gone.—They were a forest of giant oaks; but the all-resistless hurricane has swept over them, and
left only, here and there, a lonely trunk, despoiled of its verdure, shorn of its
foliage; unshading and unshaded, to murmur in a few more gentle breezes, and to combat
with its mutilated limbs, a few more ruder storms, then to sink, and be no more.
They were the pillars of the temple of liberty; and now, that they have crumbled away, that
temple must fall, unless we, their descendants, supply their places with other pillars,
hewn from the solid quarry of sober reason. Passion has helped us; but can do so
no more. It will in future be our enemy. Reason, cold, calculating, unimpassioned
reason, must furnish all the materials for our future support and defence.—Let those materials be moulded into general intelligence, . . . sound morality and, in particular, a reverence for the constitution and laws: and, that we improved to the last; that we remained free to the last; that we revered
his name to the last; that, during his long sleep, we permitted no hostile foot to
pass over or desecrate . . . [his resting] place; shall be that which to . . . [learn the last] trump shall awaken our Wash[ington.]13
. . . [Upon these] let the proud fabric of freedom . . . [rest, as the rock]14 of its basis; and as truly as has been said of the only greater institution, “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”
Matthew 16:18
1Portions of the original source text from the Sangamo Journal are torn, leaving gaps in some places and in others making the works illegible.
Roy P. Basler, editor of The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, faced a similar problem. Basler supplied the missing or unreadable text from John
G. Nicolay and John Hay’s Complete Works of Abraham Lincoln. The editors have also supplied text drawn from Nicolay’s and Hay’s text.
2John Nicolay and John Hay used this date for this document in the Complete Works of Abraham Lincoln. The date 1837, however, is a typographical error. In its January 27, 1838 edition,
the Sangamo Journal announced that the Lyceum would meet on that evening and that Abraham Lincoln had
been asked to address the members.
John G. Nicolay and John Hay, eds., Complete Works of Abraham Lincoln, new and enlarged ed. (New York: Francis D. Tandy, 1905), 1:35; Sangamo Journal (Springfield, IL), 27 January 1838, 2:7.
5In the mid to late 1830s, mob violence, rioting, and vigilantism rose sharply through
most of the United States. Economic hardship associated with the Panic of 1837, party politics, the rise of abolitionism, and racial, ethnic, and religious enmities
were the most common provocations for disorder. White abolitionists and their free black supporters were often targets of mobs and rioters. The most
notorious case of violence against abolitionists in Illinois was the murder of Elijah
P. Lovejoy on November 7, 1837.
Daniel Walker Howe, What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1848 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 430-33.
6The “Mississippi case” that Lincoln references occurred in the summer of 1835. In
June, rumors of a imminent slave revolt began circulating in Madison County, prompting
a mob on July 2 to hang slaves suspected of conspiring in the plot and, two days later,
hang two supposed white accomplices. Fear, panic, and subsequent mob violence spread
to Hinds, Warren, and other counties. By mid-July, approximately twelve white men
and countless African-Americans had fallen victim to vigilantism.
Coinciding with the slave insurrection scare was an attack on professional gamblers
in Vicksburg. Ordinary citizens resented the gamblers, and tensions reached its peak at the July
4th celebration, when an altercation occurred, prompting citizens the next day to
post a notice calling for the gamblers to leave within twenty-four hours. The gamblers
ignored this notice, and on July 6, a mob led by the local militia surrounded their
establishment. Someone forced the door, the crowd rushed in, and the gamblers opened
fire, killing Hugh Bodley, a young physician. The mob subsequently captured and hanged
five gamblers.
Sangamo Journal (Springfield, IL), 25 July 1835, 1:4; 1 August 1835, 2:2-3; Niles’ Weekly Register (Baltimore, MD), 25 July 1835, 363:1; 1 August 1835, 377:1-2; Edwin A. Miles, “The
Mississippi Slave Insurrection Scare of 1835,” Journal of Negro History 42 (January 1957), 48-60; Joshua R. Rothman, “The Hazards of the Flush Times: Gambling,
Mob Violence, and the Anxieties of America’s Market Revolution,” Journal of American History 95 (December 2008), 651-77.
7Francis McIntosh was burned to death on April 28, 1836. A free African-American,
McIntosh worked as a cook and porter abroad the steamboat Flora. On April 28, the Flora docked at St. Louis. Leaving the boat that evening, McIntosh became embroiled in
a dispute with the local police, and subsequently two police officers arrested him
for interfering with their attempts to apprehend two Flora sailors for disturbing the peace. Charged with breach of the peace, McIntosh, as
he was being escorted to jail, asked the officers how long he would have to remain
in jail. When informed that he could serve up the five years in prison for the crime,
McIntosh stabbed the two officers, injuring one and killing the other. Captured and
taken to jail, a mob forcibly removed McIntosh from jail and lynched him in the manner
Lincoln described. No one was ever charged or convicted of McIntosh’s murder.
Sangamo Journal (Springfield, IL), 7 May 1836, 1:6; Paul Simon, Freedom’s Champion: Elijah Lovejoy (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1994), 45-48.
10A reference to the murder of Elijah P. Lovejoy and the destruction of his printing
press.
Simon, Freedom’s Champion, 131-33.
12Reference to Alexander the Great, Napoleon I of France, and perhaps Julius Caesar or any number of caesars of the Roman Empire.
Printed Document, 1 page(s), Sangamo Journal (Springfield, IL), 3 February 1838, 2:3-5.