Charles H. Ray to Abraham Lincoln, [before 27 August 1858]1
Sent for Lincoln’s Consideration:—
_______
The Judge asks me if I will vote for the abolition of Slavery in the Dist. of Columbia?2
I answer in a way that will would be eminently satisfactory to the Judge, were he not in favor of the Dred Scott decision—in a way that establishes my sincerity of belief in Real Popular Sovereignty: When a majority of the people of that District are in favor of ridding themselves of the “institution”, I will, as a Senator of the United States, do all I can
<Page 2>
to gratify their wishes. When they manifest their wishes, as a Real Popular Sovereignty man, I will vote as many times as they please for any constitutional mea what they ask in this direction. Can the Judge say as much?3
How do you like it?Ray,

<Page 3>
[Envelope]
1Charles H. Ray wrote and signed this undated letter, including Abraham Lincoln’s name and the address on the envelope.
The editors conjectured the date from the letter’s content and Lincoln’s delivery address. Ray is writing Lincoln during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. Lincoln was the Republican candidate from Illinois for U.S. Senate in 1858. In the summer and fall of that year, Lincoln and his Democratic opponent, the incumbent Stephen A. Douglas, held a series of seven debates throughout the state. During the first debate in Ottawa, Illinois, on August 21, Douglas challenged Lincoln to answer a series of questions, including if Lincoln would vote to abolish slavery in the District of Columbia if elected. On August 23, Lincoln wrote Ebenezer Peck and Norman B. Judd asking them to meet him in Freeport, Illinois, the site of the second debate, to discuss how to cope with Douglas’s tactics introduced at Ottawa. The fact that Ray wrote this letter in response to Douglas’s questions at Ottawa and addressed it to Lincoln at Freeport suggests that he intended for Lincoln to consider these talking points ahead of the second debate at Freeport on August 27. See the 1858 Illinois Republican Convention; 1858 Federal Election.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008), 1:457-85; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Freeport, Illinois; The Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, 21 August 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-08-21; 23 August 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-08-23; 27 August 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-08-27; Abraham Lincoln to Ebenezer Peck
2The issues of slavery and its national expansion became focal points of the Senate race. During the first debate at Ottawa, Douglas erroneously accused Lincoln of helping to write a platform that called for abolishing slavery in the District of Columbia at the 1854 Anti-Nebraska convention in Springfield, Illinois. In truth, this resolution originated as part of a convention platform adopted at Aurora, Illinois. No such resolution appeared in the platform adopted at the state convention in Springfield. Lincoln took no part in either convention. Still, Douglas questioned whether Lincoln “stands to-day pledged to the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia.”
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:489-90; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Freeport, Illinois.
3Douglas regularly championed the principle of popular sovereignty, whereby the people of a territory could vote on whether to legalize slavery. This principle seemingly conflicted with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott case. The court’s majority opinion held that neither the U.S. Congress nor territorial legislatures had any authority to outlaw slavery in U.S. territories. Ray’s suggested reply to Douglas’s questions about slavery in District of Columbia seizes on this contradiction. It attempts to position Lincoln as a “Real Popular Sovereignty man” who would vote on abolishing slavery in the federal capital according to the wishes of the citizens of the district.
While Lincoln answered Douglas’s earlier question about slavery in the District of Columbia during his speech at Freeport, he made no use of Ray’s suggested “Real Popular Sovereignty” rhetoric. Instead, Lincoln indicated that while he personally favored abolishing slavery in the district, he would only vote for it if three conditions were met: that the abolition be gradual; that a majority of voters approve it; and that “unwilling owners” be compensated for the loss of enslaved persons. Lincoln did, however, take an opportunity to question Douglas’s commitment to popular sovereignty. He posed four questions concerning the admission of Kansas to the Union and the expansion of slavery. In his second question, Lincoln asked Douglas whether the people of a territory could, in light of the Dred Scott decision, “exclude slavery from its limits prior to the formation of a state constitution?” Douglas responded by establishing what became called his “Freeport Doctrine.” Douglas answered yes, citizens could exclude slavery by local legislation. “Slavery cannot exist a day or an hour anywhere,” Douglas famously retorted, “unless it is supported by local police regulations, furnishing remedies and means of enforcing the right to hold slaves.” Douglas’s Freeport Doctrine resolved the inconsistency between popular sovereignty and the Dred Scott decision on a practical level, thereby satisfying his Illinois supporters, assuring his reelection to the Senate, but denting his chances in the American South in the presidential election of 1860.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:500-9; Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 (1857); Frank L. Dennis, The Lincoln-Douglas Debates (New York: Mason & Lipscomb, 1974), 84-85; Paul M. Angle, “Freeport Doctrine,” Dictionary of American History, rev. ed. (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1976), 3:109; Carl Brent Swisher, "Dred Scott Case," Dictionary of American History (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1940), 2:167-68; Second Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Freeport, Illinois; Second Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Freeport, Illinois; Second Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Freeport, Illinois.
4Lincoln’s reply to this letter, if he wrote one, has not been located. Ray and Lincoln exchanged at least ten other letters regarding politics and the elections of 1858 between March and November 1858.
5Lincoln wrote this docketing.

Autograph Letter Signed, 3 page(s), Abraham Lincoln Papers, Library of Congress (Washington, DC).