View up to date information on how Illinois is handling the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) from the Illinois Department of Public Health


Abraham Lincoln to Richard Yates, [30 October] 18541
Dear Yates:
I am on my way to Quincy to speak for our old friend Archie Williams.3 On my way down I heard at Jacksonville a story which may harm you if not averted— namely, that you have been a Know-Nothing. I suggest that you get a denial— something like the inclosed draft which I have made—4 into the hands of a safe man in each precinct.
The day before election will do.
Yours, as ever,A. Lincoln.
1This letter is attributed to Abraham Lincoln but no manuscript version in Lincoln’s hand has been located. It is similar in content to a letter from Lincoln to Richard Yates of October 30, 1854 for which a manuscript original is extant. Roy P. Basler, editor of The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, thought it possible that this letter, published by Yates’s namesake son in a speech to Congress in 1921, was written in addition to that of October 30 and sent to a different address as Lincoln was in a hurry to reach Yates and did not know his precise whereabouts. There is, however, evidence that this published version is actually a misdated and loose transcription of the October 30 manuscript letter. When he included this letter in his speech to Congress, Richard Yates, Jr. also quoted from an 1865 note on the verso of his source manuscript, in which his father explained the context of the letter to Lincoln biographer Isaac N. Arnold. The manuscript original of the October 30 letter has such a note on verso, albeit bearing a date of June 17, 1869.
Roy P. Basler, ed., The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953), 2:284-85.
2Basler tentatively redated this letter to October 31, 1854. As Basler pointed out, Lincoln was no longer in Naples on November 1, 1854, having left for Quincy on October 31. With no manuscript original of this letter extant, Basler argued that it is impossible to ascertain if the date of November 1 is a mistake by Lincoln or a mistake that occurred in transcription for publication by Richard Yates, Jr. Whereas Basler dated this document at the latest possible date Lincoln could have written it before leaving Naples, the editors have chosen an inferred date of October 30 due to a lack of compelling evidence in preference of the later date. If this published text does indeed represent a distinct additional letter from Lincoln to Yates, it was likely composed in the presence of the October 30 manuscript as it covers the same points in the same order as that document.
Roy P. Basler, ed., The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, 2:284-85; The Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, 30 October 1854, http://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1854-10-30; 31 October 1854, http://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1854-10-31; 1 November 1854, http://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1854-11-01.
3Whig Archibald Williams was challenging incumbent Democrat William A. Richardson in the congressional race in Illinois’ Fifth Congressional District. Williams received 47.61% of the vote, losing to Richardson who garnered 52.38%.
Passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act and its effective repeal of the Missouri Compromise reawakened Lincoln’s passion for politics, and he threw himself into the congressional election campaign in the fall of 1854, crisscrossing Illinois to deliver speeches against the Kansas-Nebraska Act and in support of anti-Nebraska candidates such as Williams. Lincoln even allowed himself to become a candidate for the Illinois General Assembly (albeit reluctantly at first). As the election campaign reached its climax, Lincoln’s name began to circulate as a possible nominee for one of the state’s U.S. Senate seats. Lincoln won election to the Illinois General Assembly, but, in late-November 1854, declined to serve in order to run for the U.S. Senate. Ultimately, he did not win election to the U.S. Senate; the Illinois General Assembly selected anti-Nebraska Democrat Lyman Trumbull instead. See the 1854 Federal Election.
Howard W. Allen and Vincent A. Lacey, eds., Illinois Elections, 1818-1990 (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992), 10, 134; David Herbert Donald, Lincoln (New York: Touchstone, 1995), 167-73; Autobiography of Abraham Lincoln Written for John L. Scripps; William H. Randolph to Abraham Lincoln; Illinois Senate Journal. 1855. 19th G. A., 242-55.
4The enclosure has not been found. Yates, a Whig, was at this time running against Democrat Thomas L. Harris for reelection to Congress in Illinois’ Sixth District. Yates ultimately lost his bid for reelection, receiving 9,890 votes compared to Harris’ 10,090. As described by Richard Yates, Jr., the note from Richard Yates to biographer Arnold on verso of the manuscript original of this document read: “This was good advice, but it came too late. In a district lost by us on the Presidency by 2,000, I was defeated by only 200, over half of whom, I am sure, voted against me because of a false and sworn-to affidavit that I had been seen in a Know-Nothing lodge.” The abovementioned related October 30, 1854 manuscript letter from Lincoln to Yates and note by Yates on verso, include the detail that Lincoln and Yates were concerned how the allegation that Yates was Know Nothing would influence foreign-born German and English voters in Morgan County.
The Democratic Illinois State Register had reported on October 25, 1854 that when at the “English settlement” of Lynnville in Morgan County, Yates had been asked his opinion on Know Nothings and had pandered to his audience by denouncing the organization. After Yates lost his reelection bid, the opposing Illinois Daily Journal published a note complaining that a person in Morgan County identified only as “W.” should go to prison for his role in Yates’s defeat. The Register then responded by claiming that “W.” was a prominent “old line whig” and veteran of the Mexican War from Morgan County who had supported Harris and denounced what the paper claimed was an effort by the Journal and fanatical “abolitionized whigs” to discourage national Whigs from joining with Democrats to support the Compromise of 1850. The Journal replied that “W.” had never been a Whig but was in fact a locofoco who joined a Know Nothing organization then swore that Yates was also a member “in order to prevent the 400 English whigs in Morgan and Scott from voting for Dick Yates.” The Journal also reprinted an article from the Jacksonville Constitutionist that argued that Yates had likely lost 200 votes in Morgan County through the efforts of his opponents to convince foreign-born residents there that he was a Know Nothing. In Morgan County, Yates had received 1,591 votes and Harris, 1,409.
Lincoln would later be called on to deny rumors that he himself had been in a Know Nothing lodge in Quincy during his November 1854 visit to the town. According to Lincoln, it was Richardson who started this rumor.
Howard W. Allen and Vincent A. Lacey, eds., Illinois Elections, 1818-1990, 10, 134; Cong. Rec., 66th Cong., 3rd Sess., 3077 (1921); Illinois State Register (Springfield), 25 October 1854, 2:2; 15 November 1854, 2:1; Illinois Daily Journal (Springfield), 11 November 1854, 2:1; 15 November 1854, 2:2, 2:3; Abraham Jonas to Abraham Lincoln; Abraham Lincoln to Abraham Jonas.

Printed Transcription, 1 page(s), Cong. Rec., 66th Cong., 3rd Sess., 3077 (1921).