Report of Speech at Clinton, Illinois, 27 July 18581
In the evening, in compliance with the earnest wishes of his many friends here, Mr. Lincoln addressed the people at the Court House yard.2 At the commencement of his speech the people were scattered over the town, but they soon began to pour in, and in a short time the yard north of the Court House was crowded with an attentive audience of ladies and gentlemen. Mr. Lincoln began in his own plain, straight-forward manner, by calling attention to Mr. Douglas’ plan of the campaign, and his ready observance of the Mormon precept: “Sound your own horn, for behold if you sound not your own horn, your horn shall not be sounded.”3 He then alluded to the immense credit which Douglas claimed for his discovery and advocacy for “squatter sovereignty.” He said that Mr. D. claimed the confidence of the people on the ground that he had initiated the policy of giving the people the right of governing themselves, and he enquired whether in the practice of that much boasted Douglas policy, the people of Kansas had not really less control of their own affairs than the people of any State or Territory in the whole history of the world!4 To this pointed enquiry the people responded with hearty cheers and cries of “good!” He then showed that so far as experience can afford evidence, squatter sovereignty is a failure. After a withering allusion to the angelic temper, which Douglas had displayed in his speech, Mr. Lincoln [concoln?] congratulated the people on the fact that the little giant had at last been forced to quote his words correctly. “This,” said Mr. L., “is all I want, and, I only ask my friends and all who are eager for the truth, that when they hear me represented as saying or meaning anything strange, they will turn to my own words and examine for themselves. I do not wish Douglas to put words in my mouth— I do not wish him to construe my words as he pleases, and then represent me as meaning what he wishes me to mean, but I do wish the people to read and judge for themselves.” Mr. Lincoln then proceeded to treat the conspiracy charge which Douglas had so furiously denied in the afternoon.5 He said that he had made the charge deliberately and calmly, believing when he did so that the evidence of a thousand corroborating circumstances fully bore him out. When he saw a number of men engaged in pursuing a similar work, when he saw that their efforts all tended in the same direction that each was performing a necessary part, and that the combined labors of all had the effect of building an edifice, he did not believe that the coincidence occurred by chance, but that there was a preconcerted plan, a common design running through the whole of it. He had never made the charge nor pretended to make it upon any knowledge that he had personally, apart from the evidence before the public; nay, he had told the public repeatedly why, and on what grounds he brought the charge. Douglas might pretend honesty, and try to impress upon the minds of his hearers by the affected indignation with which he denied the charge, but when he, (Lincoln) saw Mr. Douglas filling so prominent a part in the movement towards the nationalization of slavery— when he saw the important sphere which he had performed in the common design, he could not resist the conclusion “that Douglas either was a conspirator or the dupe of conspirators.”6 At this point the audience testified its approval by tremendous cheering. Mr. L. then referred to the charge that Douglas brought against him of being sectional in his policy and associates. “Now,” said Mr. L., “I have merely to say, that inasmuch as the party to which I belong extends at least over all the free States, and commands a majority of them, and even extends into the South; and inasmuch as Mr. Douglas cannot command one Congressional district, North or south, east or west, outside of Illinois, which, I ask, best deserves to be termed sectional, he or I?7 (cheers.” Mr. Lincoln then addressed himself to the matter of the Dred Scott decision, and came down with crushing force upon the decision and those who maintained it. In reply to the allegation of Douglas that a man who would give an opinion on a case before his election to a judgeship, which case he would afterwards be called upon to decide, must be a man utterly unworthy of respect; he declared that on that point Douglas was the best possible authority, inasmuch as he was elected upon the merits of a pre-judged case to the Supreme bench of Illinois! And Mr. Lincoln was prepared to prove by the delarations of hundreds of living men that Douglas himself had often publicly approved of the action of the Democratic party, and
<Page 2>
General Jackson in over-riding the decision of the Supreme Court in the affair of the United States Bank.8 Mr. Lincoln then proceeded to consider the question of slavery extension; he declared that he hated slavery, but that he did not consider that the public had any right to interfere with the institution where it existed under State laws. He did not believe that the white man had a right to deprive the negro of the little which God had given him; but he did not consider that therefore, the distinct races must be socially and politically equal. But for the sake of the millions of the free laborers of the North,— for the sake of the poor white man of the South, and for the sake of the eternal prosperity of the Union, he was opposed to slavery extending one inch beyond its present limits.9
He then referred to the lies which had been circulated concerning his vote in Congress concerning the supplies to the soldiers in the Mexican war. He said that he was opposed to that war on principle, but that on every motion to grant extra pay, votes of thanks, land warrants, or supplies, he had invariably voted “Yes.” We hope that every one who listened to the gross falsehoods of Mr. Lincoln’s enemies will examine the records for themselves, and there find the truth of what Mr. Lincoln says.10 At the conclusion of his speech, he was greeted by tremendous cheers, and an unanimous cry was raised for Mr. Weldon.11
1Abraham Lincoln delivered a speech in Clinton, Illinois, on July 27, 1858. The Central Transcript published this report of his speech in its July 30 edition. Lincoln was the Illinois Republican Party’s candidate to replace Democratic incumbent Stephen A. Douglas in the U.S. Senate. Both men traveled the state throughout the fall and summer of 1858, delivering public speeches in support of candidates for the Illinois General Assembly in their respective parties and participating in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. They each devoted significant time and effort to the local elections for members of the Illinois House of Representatives and the Illinois Senate because, at the time, members of the General Assembly voted for and elected the state’s representatives in the U.S. Senate.
The Central Transcript (Clinton, IL), 30 July 1858, 2:6; 3:1; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008), 1:458; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858,” The Journal of American History 94 (September 2007), 392, 394.
2One of the people who requested Lincoln speak in Clinton was Lawrence Weldon. He wrote Lincoln a letter on July 8, asking Lincoln to visit Clinton as one of the “hottest” districts in central Illinois in terms of competitiveness. Lincoln and Douglas both focused their efforts in the 1858 election campaign on the former Whig stronghold of central Illinois, where the state legislative races were the closest.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:476; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858,” 392, 400.
3Lincoln is most likely making a humorous sarcastic remark about biblical admonitions against praising oneself or announcing one’s own good deeds.
Matthew 6:2; Proverbs 27:2.
4Lincoln made these same arguments in other speeches he delivered during the campaign of 1858—both before and after this speech in Clinton. He ridiculed Douglas’s claim that popular sovereignty was an entirely new concept, created by him in order to secure the right of the people to govern themselves, pointing out that the Declaration of Independence asserted that governments derive “their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
5Douglas delivered a speech in Clinton earlier that day, in the afternoon. Lincoln was present for the speech.
The Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, 27 July 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-07-27; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858,” 404; Report of Speech at Havana, Illinois.
6The “conspiracy charge” is a reference to an assertion Lincoln first made at the start of the campaign. During his nomination at the 1858 Illinois Republican Convention, Lincoln delivered an address—widely known as his “House Divided” speech—in which he charged that Douglas was part of a plot or conspiracy to nationalize slavery. Lincoln argued that the plot began with Douglas’s Kansas-Nebraska bill, which President Franklin Pierce supported, then was advanced by both the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott case—handed down by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney—and by President James Buchanan’s call to support the court’s decision. Lincoln warned his audience that, if Douglas were not defeated and the slave power not overthrown, another Supreme Court ruling could build upon the Dred Scott decision and proclaim that the U.S. Constitution prohibited states from excluding slavery within their own borders.
Lincoln repeated his charges of Douglas being part of a plot to nationalize slavery throughout the 1858 campaign—both in speeches and during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:458-61, 492-540; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Fragment of A House Divided Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; David Herbert Donald, Lincoln (New York: Touchstone, 1995), 206-9.
7In a July 9 speech in Chicago, Illinois, Douglas denounced Lincoln’s House Divided speech and accused him of fomenting a sectional war to achieve “uniformity in local and domestic affairs” which, Douglas asserted, “would be destructive . . . of personal liberty and personal freedom.” Douglas repeated these claims while on the campaign trail, including during the first and second Lincoln-Douglas Debates, deliberately misrepresenting Lincoln’s famous remarks that, “‘A house divided against itself cannot stand.’ I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free” by casting aside the remainder of Lincoln’s central argument that he did not “expect the Union to be dissolved,” but rather believed that either the opponents of slavery would arrest the spread of slavery, or the advocates of slavery would use various methods to make slavery national. Douglas argued that Lincoln’s remarks were sectionalist and amounted to incitement of civil war and advocacy of the abolition of slavery.
8Throughout the campaign of 1858, Douglas attacked Lincoln and other Republicans’ criticism of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Scott v. Sandford, arguing that any criticism of the court’s decision was tantamount to resistance of the U.S. government as a whole. Lincoln replied by pointing to Douglas’s previous praise of President Andrew Jackson for defying the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the 1819 case McCulloch v. Maryland, when the court declared that the U.S. Congress had the power to create a national bank. The Dred Scott case remained an issue throughout the 1858 campaign, with Lincoln warning that another Supreme Court ruling could make slavery a national institution.
Lincoln also referenced Douglas’s election to the Illinois Supreme Court with his comments, as reported above, that Douglas was elected to the supreme bench “upon the merits of a pre-judged case.” Following their victories at the state level in 1840—and harboring resentment about the Illinois Supreme Court Whig majority’s decision on a case related to alien voting rights as well as one related to the Illinois governor’s right to remove the Illinois secretary of state—Illinois Democrats proposed reorganizing the Illinois Supreme Court and increasing the number of supreme court justices as a way to solidify their position in state politics. After bitter debate, and enthusiastic lobbying by Douglas, the bill eventually passed. Illinois Democrats rewarded Douglas for his effort by electing him to one of the five new seats on the Illinois Supreme Court. See Illinois Judiciary Act of 1841.
For additional information on the alien voting rights case that spurred the Illinois Democrats’s resentment and reorganization of the Illinois Supreme Court, see Thomas Spragins v. Horace H. Houghton, 2 IL 377-417 (1840).
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:439-41, 464-70, 501, 503, 510; Robert W. Johannsen, Stephen A. Douglas (New York: Oxford University Press, 1973), 82-84, 92-96; A Bill Reorganizing the Judiciary of the State of Illinois; An Act Reorganizing the Judiciary of the State of Illinois.
9Throughout the summer and fall of 1858, Douglas claimed that Lincoln and his fellow Republicans were abolitionists who favored political as well as social equality for African Americans, including “amalgamation” of the races through interracial marriage. These were charges Lincoln routinely denied, even before the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. During the first Lincoln-Douglas Debate in Ottawa, Illinois, Lincoln also asserted that although he believed the Declaration of Independence applied to all men—rather than just white men—and that he opposed the expansion of slavery, he did not favor full social and political equality between the races, nor did he intend to abolish slavery.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:440-41, 493, 506; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois.
10Douglas and the Democratic press attacked Lincoln in the public sphere, claiming that, during his time in the U.S. House of Representatives, he denied critical wartime supplies to U.S. troops fighting in the Mexican War. Douglas and his political allies insinuated that this placed American troops in greater peril and constituted Lincoln taking the enemy’s side. In reality, although Lincoln opposed the Mexican War and questioned its constitutionality during his time in the U.S. House, he nevertheless always voted in favor of supplies for U.S. troops serving in the field.
Despite publication of the facts surrounding Lincoln's voting record in the U.S. House in the Illinois press as early as June 25, 1858—including by Democratic newspapers—Douglas repeated the Daily Chicago Times's claims throughout the election campaign. In speeches he delivered during the campaign, including during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, Lincoln repeatedly refuted the charges and cited congressional records to back up his voting record in the U.S. House.
Daily Chicago Times (IL), 23 June 1858, 2:1-2; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:265-68, 526-27; ‘‘Spot'' Resolutions in the United States House of Representatives; ‘‘Spot'' Resolutions in the United States House of Representatives; Speech in United States House of Representatives: The War with Mexico; Speech in United States House of Representatives: The War with Mexico; Mark E. Neely, Jr., Lincoln and the Triumph of the Nation: Constitutional Conflict in the American Civil War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2011), 33; Daily Illinois State Journal (Springfield), 25 June 1858, 2:1; Daily Illinois State Register (Springfield), 26 June 1858, 2:2.
11Laurence Weldon addressed the crowd immediately following Lincoln.
Lincoln and Douglas dined together on July 28, the day after this speech, either in Clinton or in Decatur, Illinois, where Lincoln spoke next. Lincoln delivered another speech in Clinton on September 2.
Ultimately, in the local elections of 1858, Republicans won a majority of all votes cast in Illinois, but pro-Douglas Democrats retained control of the Illinois General Assembly and Douglas won reelection. Through the campaign, however, and in particular through his participation in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, Lincoln gained recognition as well as standing within the national Republican Party.
The Central Transcript, (Clinton, IL) , 30 July 1858, 3:1; The Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, 28 July 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-07-28; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:556-57; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:556-57; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858,” 414.

Copy of Printed Document, 2 page(s), The Central Transcript , (Clinton , IL) , 30 July 1858, 2:6; 3:1. .