Report of Speech at Clinton,
Illinois, 27 July 18581
In the evening, in compliance with
the earnest wishes of his many friends
here, Mr.
Lincoln
addressed the people at the Court House yard.2 At the commencement of his speech the people
were scattered over the
town, but they soon began to pour in, and
in a short time the yard north of the Court House was crowded with an attentive
audience of ladies and gentlemen. Mr. Lincoln began in his own plain,
straight-forward manner, by calling attention to Mr.
Douglas’ plan
of the campaign, and
his ready observance of the Mormon precept: “Sound your own horn, for
behold if you sound not your own horn, your horn shall not be sounded.”3 He then
alluded to the immense credit which Douglas claimed for his discovery and advocacy for “squatter sovereignty.” He said that Mr.
D. claimed the
confidence of the people on the ground that he had
initiated the policy of giving the people the right of governing themselves,
and he enquired whether in the practice of that much boasted Douglas policy,
the people of
Kansas had not really less
control of their own affairs than the people of any State or Territory in the
whole history of the world!4 To this pointed enquiry the people responded with
hearty cheers and cries of “good!” He then showed that so far as experience can
afford evidence, squatter sovereignty is a failure. After a withering allusion
to the angelic temper, which Douglas had displayed in his speech, Mr. Lincoln
[concoln?] congratulated the people on the
fact that the little
giant had at last been forced to quote his words correctly.
“This,” said Mr.
L., “is all I want, and, I only ask my friends and all who are
eager for the truth, that when they hear me represented as saying or meaning
anything strange, they will turn to my own words and examine for themselves. I
do not wish Douglas to put words in my mouth— I do not wish him to construe my
words as he pleases, and then represent me as meaning what he wishes me to
mean, but I do wish the people to read and judge for themselves.”
Mr. Lincoln then proceeded to treat the conspiracy charge which Douglas had so
furiously denied in the afternoon.5 He said that he had made the charge
deliberately and calmly, believing when he did so that the evidence of a
thousand corroborating circumstances fully bore him out. When he saw a number
of men engaged in pursuing a similar work, when he saw that their efforts all
tended in the same direction that each was performing a necessary part, and
that the combined labors of all had the effect of building an edifice, he did
not believe that the coincidence occurred by chance, but that there was a
preconcerted plan, a common design running through the whole of it. He had
never made the charge nor pretended to make it upon any knowledge that he had
personally, apart from the evidence before the public; nay, he had told the
public repeatedly why, and on what grounds he brought the charge. Douglas might
pretend honesty, and try to impress upon the minds of his hearers by the
affected indignation with which he denied the charge, but when he, (Lincoln)
saw Mr. Douglas filling so prominent a part in the movement towards the
nationalization of slavery— when he saw the important sphere which he had
performed in the common design, he could not resist the conclusion “that Douglas either was a conspirator or the dupe of
conspirators.”6 At this point the audience
testified its approval by tremendous cheering. Mr. L. then referred to the
charge that Douglas brought against him of being sectional in his policy and associates. “Now,” said Mr. L., “I
have merely to say, that inasmuch as the
party to which I
belong extends at least over all the free States, and commands a majority of
them, and even extends into the South; and inasmuch as Mr. Douglas cannot
command one Congressional district, North or south, east or west, outside of
Illinois, which, I ask, best deserves to
be termed sectional, he or I?”7 (cheers.” Mr. Lincoln then addressed himself to the
matter of the Dred Scott
decision, and came down with crushing force upon the decision and those
who maintained it. In reply to the allegation of Douglas that a man who would
give an opinion on a case before his election to a judgeship, which case he
would afterwards be called upon to decide, must be a man utterly unworthy of
respect; he declared that on that point Douglas was the best possible
authority, inasmuch as he was elected upon the merits of a pre-judged case to
the Supreme bench of
Illinois! And Mr. Lincoln was prepared to prove by the
delarations of hundreds of living men that
Douglas himself had often publicly approved of the action of the
Democratic party,
and
<Page 2>
General
Jackson in over-riding the decision of the
Supreme Court in
the affair of the United
States Bank.8 Mr. Lincoln then proceeded to
consider the question of slavery extension; he declared that he hated slavery,
but that he did not consider that the public had any right to interfere with
the institution where it existed under State laws. He did not believe that the
white man had a right to deprive the negro of the little which God had given
him; but he did not consider that therefore, the distinct races must be
socially and politically equal. But for the sake of the millions of the free
laborers of the North,— for the sake of the poor white man of the South, and
for the sake of the eternal prosperity of the Union, he was opposed to slavery
extending one inch beyond its present limits.9He then referred
to the lies which had been circulated concerning his vote in
Congress concerning
the supplies to the soldiers in the
Mexican war. He said
that he was opposed to that war on principle, but that on every motion to grant
extra pay, votes of thanks, land warrants, or supplies, he had invariably voted
“Yes.” We hope that every one who listened to the gross falsehoods of Mr.
Lincoln’s enemies will examine the records for themselves, and there find the
truth of what Mr. Lincoln says.10 At the conclusion of his speech, he was greeted by
tremendous cheers, and an unanimous cry was raised for Mr.
Weldon.11
1Abraham
Lincoln delivered a speech in Clinton, Illinois, on July 27, 1858. The
Central Transcript
published this report of his speech in its July 30 edition. Lincoln was the
Illinois
Republican Party’s
candidate to replace Democratic incumbent Stephen A. Douglas in the
U.S. Senate. Both
men traveled the state throughout the fall and summer of
1858, delivering public speeches in support of candidates for the
Illinois General
Assembly in their respective parties and participating in the
Lincoln-Douglas
Debates. They each devoted significant time and effort to the local
elections for members of the Illinois House of Representatives and the
Illinois Senate
because, at the time, members of the General Assembly voted for and elected the
state’s representatives in the U.S. Senate.
The Central
Transcript (Clinton, IL), 30 July 1858, 2:6; 3:1; Michael Burlingame,
Abraham Lincoln: A Life (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University
Press, 2008), 1:458; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and
the Political Landscape of 1858,” The Journal of American
History 94 (September 2007), 392, 394.
2One of the people who requested Lincoln speak in
Clinton was Lawrence Weldon. He wrote Lincoln a
letter on July 8, asking Lincoln to visit Clinton as one of the “hottest”
districts in central Illinois in terms of competitiveness. Lincoln and
Douglas both focused their efforts in the
1858 election
campaign on the former
Whig stronghold of
central Illinois, where the state legislative races were the closest.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:476; Allen
C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of
1858,” 392, 400.
3Lincoln is most likely making a humorous sarcastic remark about biblical admonitions
against praising oneself or announcing one’s own good deeds.
Matthew 6:2; Proverbs 27:2.
4Lincoln
made these same arguments in other speeches he delivered during the
campaign of
1858—both before and after this speech in Clinton. He ridiculed
Douglas’s claim that popular sovereignty was an entirely new concept, created
by him in order to secure the right of the people to govern themselves,
pointing out that the Declaration of Independence asserted that governments
derive “their just powers from the consent of the governed.”
Report
of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech
at Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech at
Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech at Paris,
Illinois; Report of Speech at Edwardsville,
Illinois; Julian P. Boyd et al, eds., The Papers of Thomas
Jefferson (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950),
1:429.
5Douglas delivered a speech in Clinton earlier that
day, in the afternoon. Lincoln was present for the speech.
The
Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, 27 July
1858,
https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-07-27;
Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape
of 1858,” 404; Report of Speech at Havana, Illinois.
6The
“conspiracy charge” is a reference to an assertion Lincoln first made at the
start of the campaign. During his nomination at the
1858 Illinois Republican
Convention, Lincoln delivered an address—widely known as his “House
Divided” speech—in which he charged that Douglas was part of a plot or
conspiracy to nationalize slavery. Lincoln argued that the plot began with
Douglas’s Kansas-Nebraska
bill, which President
Franklin
Pierce supported, then was advanced by both the
U.S. Supreme
Court’s decision in the Dred Scott case—handed down by Chief Justice
Roger B.
Taney—and by President
James
Buchanan’s call to support the court’s decision. Lincoln warned his
audience that, if Douglas were not defeated and the slave power not overthrown,
another Supreme Court ruling could build upon the Dred Scott decision and
proclaim that the U.S. Constitution prohibited states from excluding slavery
within their own borders.
Lincoln repeated his charges of Douglas being
part of a plot to nationalize slavery throughout the 1858 campaign—both in
speeches and during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
Michael Burlingame,
Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:458-61, 492-540;
Report of Speech at
Springfield, Illinois;
Report of Speech at
Springfield, Illinois;
Fragment of A House
Divided Speech at Springfield, Illinois;
Report of Speech at
Springfield, Illinois; David Herbert Donald, Lincoln (New
York: Touchstone, 1995), 206-9.
7In a July 9 speech in
Chicago,
Illinois, Douglas denounced Lincoln’s House Divided speech and
accused him of fomenting a sectional war to achieve “uniformity in local and
domestic affairs” which, Douglas asserted, “would be destructive . . . of
personal liberty and personal freedom.” Douglas repeated these claims while on
the campaign trail, including during the first and second Lincoln-Douglas
Debates, deliberately misrepresenting Lincoln’s famous remarks that, “‘A house
divided against itself cannot stand.’ I believe this government cannot endure
permanently half slave and half free” by casting aside the remainder of
Lincoln’s central argument that he did not “expect the Union to be dissolved,”
but rather believed that either the opponents of slavery would arrest the
spread of slavery, or the advocates of slavery would use various methods to
make slavery national. Douglas argued that Lincoln’s remarks were sectionalist
and amounted to incitement of civil war and advocacy of the
abolition of
slavery.
Chicago Daily Press and Tribune (IL), 10 July
1858, 1:4-5; Report of
Speech at Springfield, Illinois;
Report of Speech at
Springfield, Illinois;
Fragment of A House
Divided Speech at Springfield, Illinois;
Report of Speech at
Springfield, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen
A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate
with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa,
Illinois; Second Debate with Stephen A. Douglas
at Freeport, Illinois; Second Debate with
Stephen A. Douglas at Freeport, Illinois; Second
Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Freeport, Illinois; Michael
Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:461-66,
468-69.
8Throughout the
campaign of 1858, Douglas attacked Lincoln and other Republicans’ criticism of
the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Scott v.
Sandford, arguing that any criticism of the court’s decision was
tantamount to resistance of the U.S. government as a whole. Lincoln replied by
pointing to Douglas’s previous praise of President Andrew Jackson for defying
the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the 1819 case McCulloch
v. Maryland, when the court declared that the U.S. Congress had the
power to create a national bank. The Dred Scott case remained an issue
throughout the 1858 campaign, with Lincoln warning that another Supreme Court
ruling could make slavery a national institution.
Lincoln also referenced
Douglas’s election to the Illinois Supreme Court with his comments, as reported
above, that Douglas was elected to the supreme bench “upon the merits of a
pre-judged case.” Following their victories at the state level in 1840—and
harboring resentment about the Illinois Supreme Court Whig majority’s decision
on a case related to alien voting rights as well as one related to the Illinois
governor’s right to remove the Illinois secretary of state—Illinois Democrats
proposed reorganizing the Illinois Supreme Court and increasing the number of
supreme court justices as a way to solidify their position in state politics.
After bitter debate, and enthusiastic lobbying by Douglas, the bill eventually
passed. Illinois Democrats rewarded Douglas for his effort by electing him to
one of the five new seats on the Illinois Supreme Court. See
Illinois Judiciary Act of
1841.
For additional information on the alien voting rights case
that spurred the Illinois Democrats’s resentment and reorganization of the
Illinois Supreme Court, see Thomas
Spragins v. Horace H. Houghton, 2 IL 377-417 (1840).
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:439-41,
464-70, 501, 503, 510; Robert W. Johannsen, Stephen A. Douglas
(New York: Oxford University Press, 1973), 82-84, 92-96; A Bill Reorganizing the Judiciary of the State of
Illinois; An Act Reorganizing the Judiciary of
the State of Illinois.
9Throughout the summer and fall of 1858, Douglas
claimed that Lincoln and his fellow Republicans were abolitionists who favored
political as well as social equality for African Americans, including
“amalgamation” of the races through interracial marriage. These were charges
Lincoln routinely denied, even before the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. During the
first Lincoln-Douglas Debate in
Ottawa,
Illinois, Lincoln also asserted that although he believed the
Declaration of Independence applied to all men—rather than just white men—and
that he opposed the expansion of slavery, he did not favor full social and
political equality between the races, nor did he intend to abolish slavery.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:440-41,
493, 506; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois;
Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois;
Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois;
First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa,
Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas
at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen
A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois.
10Douglas and the Democratic press attacked Lincoln in the public sphere, claiming that,
during his time in the U.S. House of
Representatives, he denied critical wartime supplies to U.S. troops fighting in the Mexican War.
Douglas and his political allies insinuated that this placed American troops in greater
peril and constituted Lincoln taking the enemy’s side. In reality, although Lincoln
opposed the Mexican War and questioned its constitutionality during his time in the
U.S. House, he nevertheless always voted in favor of supplies for U.S. troops serving
in the field.
Despite publication of the facts surrounding Lincoln's voting record in the U.S. House
in the Illinois press as early as June 25, 1858—including by Democratic newspapers—Douglas
repeated the Daily Chicago Times's claims throughout the election campaign. In speeches he delivered during the campaign,
including during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, Lincoln repeatedly refuted the charges
and cited congressional records to back up his voting record in the U.S. House.
Daily Chicago Times (IL), 23 June 1858, 2:1-2; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life,
1:265-68, 526-27; ‘‘Spot'' Resolutions in the United States House of Representatives;
‘‘Spot'' Resolutions in the United States House of Representatives; Speech in
United States House of Representatives: The War with Mexico; Speech in United
States House of Representatives: The War with Mexico; Mark E. Neely, Jr.,
Lincoln and the Triumph of the Nation: Constitutional Conflict in the American
Civil War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2011),
33; Daily Illinois State Journal (Springfield), 25 June 1858, 2:1; Daily Illinois State Register (Springfield), 26 June 1858, 2:2.
11Laurence Weldon addressed the crowd
immediately following Lincoln.
Lincoln and Douglas dined together on July
28, the day after this speech, either in Clinton or in
Decatur,
Illinois, where Lincoln spoke next. Lincoln delivered another speech in Clinton on September 2.
Ultimately, in the local elections of 1858, Republicans won a majority of all votes
cast in Illinois, but pro-Douglas Democrats retained control of the Illinois General
Assembly and Douglas won reelection. Through the campaign, however, and in particular
through his participation in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, Lincoln gained recognition
as well as standing within the national Republican Party.
The Central Transcript, (Clinton, IL) , 30 July 1858, 3:1;
The Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham
Lincoln, 28 July 1858,
https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-07-28;
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:556-57; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:556-57; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political
Landscape of 1858,” 414.
Copy of Printed Document,
2 page(s), The Central Transcript , (Clinton , IL) , 30 July
1858, 2:6; 3:1. .