Report of Speech at Havana, Illinois, 14 August 18581
PROGRESS OF THE CAMPAIGN.
Grand Republican Rally in Mason County.
ABE LINCOLN AND JUDGE KELLOGG AT HAVANA.
Two [Th]ousand Persons Present.
SPEECHES INCIDENTS, &C[etc]., &C., &C.
(Correspondence of the Press and Tribune.)
The fine steamer Editor, Capt Garrett,2 gaily decorated with banners, and bearing a huge inscription on her pilot house, “For Senator, Abraham Lincoln,” arrived at our levee yesterday afternoon. Douglas was inveighing against Negro Equality, and telling us what a blessing the Dred Scott decision is, when the whistle of the Editor souned half a mile down the river. Forthwith some five hundred persons broke away from the Dred Scott oration, and scattered to the landing. When the boat touched the shore three cheers were called for, and given with a vengeance, for Abraham Lincoln.3 Mr. Lincoln was greeted by a host of friends from different parts of Mason and Fulton counties, who had come to hear him reply to the amalgamation lecture which Douglas has been reading all over the State.4 Several of the old stagers of the company which Lincoln raised and commanded in the Black Hawk war, were present, and joined in the general greeting.5 A procession of carriages was then formed, and Mr. Lincoln was escorted through the principal streets to the residence of Francis Low, Esq[Esquire]. Several persons suggested the propriety of his going to the grove and hearing the remainder of Douglas’ fables. “No,” said Lincoln, “the Judge felt so ‘put out’ by my listening to him at Bloomington and Clinton, that I promised to let him alone for the rest of the canvass. I understand he is calling Trumbull and myself liars, and if he saw me in the crowd he might be so ashamed of himself as to omit the most vivid part of this argument.6
Judge Kellogg also arrived here last evening to keep his and Lincoln’s appointment at the Mason County Convention to-day.7 This afternoon the finest Republican rally we ever witnessed in this section, came off in the grove just north of the town. Fully two thousand persons were present—including delegations from Bath, Spring Lake, Chandlerville, (Cass Co.,) and various parts of Fulton county. Mr. Lincoln was introduced to the audience at precisely two o’clock, and received three rousing cheers. He said that before pursuing the line of argument which he had marked out for the day, he would call the attention of his audience to the matters between himself and Judge Douglas, which he he thought would probably answer them.
A QUESTION OF MUSCLE.
I am informed, (said he,) that my distinguished friend yesterday became a little excited, nervous, perhaps, (laughter) and he said something about fighting, as though referring to a pugilistic encounter between him and myself. Did anybody in this audience hear him use such language? (Cries of yes.) I am informed, further, that somebody in his audience, rather more excited, or nervous, than himself, took off his coat, and offered to take the job off Judge Douglas’ hands, and fight Lincoln himself. Did anybody here witness that warlike proceeding?8 (Laughter, and cries of yes.) Well, I merely desire to say that I shall fight neither Judge Douglas nor his second. (Great laughter.) I shall not do this for two reasons, which I will now explain. In the first place, a fight would prove nothing which is in issue in this contest. It might establish that Judge Douglas is a more muscular man than myself, or it might demonstrate that I am a more muscular man than Judge Douglas. But this question is not referred to in the Cincinnati platform, nor in either of the Springfield platforms.9 (Great laughter.) Neither result would prove him right or me wrong. And so of the gentleman who volunteered to do his fighting for him. If my fighting Judge Douglas would not prove anything, it would certainly prove nothing for me to fight his bottle-holder. (Continued laughter.)
My second reason for not having a personal encounter with the Judge is, that I don’t believe he wants it himself. (Laughter.) He and I are about the best friends in the world, and when we get together he would no more think of fighting me than of fighting his wife. Therefore, ladies and gentlemen, when the Judge talked about fighting, he was not giving vent to any ill-feeling of his own, but merely trying to excite—well, enthusiasm against me on the part of his audience. And as I find he was tolerably successful, we will call it quits.” (Cheers and laughter.)
“TWO UPON ONE.”
One other matter of trifling consequence,” continued Mr. Lincoln, “and I will proceed. I understand that Judge Douglas yesterday referred to the fact that both Judge Trumbull and myself are making speeches throughout the State to beat him for the Senate, and that he tried to create a sympathy by the suggestion that this was playing two upon one against him. It is true that Judge Trumbull has made a speech in Chicago, and I believe he intends to co-operate with the Republican Central Committee in their arrangements for the campaign to the extent of making other speeches in different parts of the State.10 Judge Trumbull is a Republican, like myself, and he naturally feels a lively interest in the success of his party. Is there anything wrong about that? But I will show you how little Judge Douglas’s appeal to your sympathies amounts to. At the next general election, two years from now, a Legislature will be elected which will have to choose a successor to Judge Trumbull.11 Of course there will be an effort to fill his place with a Democrat. This person, whoever he may be, is probably out making stump-speeches against me, just as Judge Douglas is. It may be one of the present Democratic members of the lower house of Congress—but whoever he is, I can tell you he has got to make some stump speeches now, or his party will not nominate him for the seat occupied by Judge Trumbull. Well, are not Judge Douglas and this man playing two upon one against me, just as much as Judge Trumbull and I are playing two upon one against Judge Douglas? (Laughter.) And if it happens that there are two Democratic aspirants for Judge Trumbull’s place, are they not playing three upon one against me, just as we are playing two upon one against Judge Douglas?12 (Renewed laughter.)
Mr. Lincoln then made a most effective speech of two hours in length, which was loudly and enthusiastically applauded. I can give an idea of its power by telling some of its effects. A delegation of Old Line Whigs who voted the Fillmore ticket in 1856, came up from Bath expressly to hear Mr. Lincoln. They had been told by the Douglas prints that there were only two planks in his platform—negro equality and amalgamation. They learned that he not only had never advocated either of these doctrines, but that the fact of Douglas’s being unable to assail him in any of his real positions, was the sole reason of his creating these fictitious and disgusting issues. They learned that in the conspiracy to Africanize the American continent, Stephen A. Douglas was the arch-conspirator—the Catiline of the cabal. Thist hey learned not from the bare say-so of Mr. Lincoln, but from a mountain of evidence.13 They learned enough things from the exercises of the day to give three rousing cheers for Abe Lincoln—enough to go home and set their town in order for a rousing majority for “Old Abe” in November. After the speeches were over they called on him and gave him an earnest invitation to go to Bath and speak on Monday—engaging to carry him over to Lewiston in time to fill his appointment in that place on Tuesday. I am glad to learn that Mr. Lincoln accepted the invitation.14 This is only one case of our complete success to-day. Large numbers from the eastern part of the county joined in the general acclaim. I cannot say that Lincoln brought back any Fremont Republicans who were inclined to go for Douglas, for the reason of there being none of that class in the good county of Mason.15
1This report of Abraham Lincoln’s speech appeared in the August 20, 1858 edition of the Chicago Daily Press and Tribune. It is the most complete report of his speech in Havana, Illinois, known to be extant.
Chicago Daily Press and Tribune (IL) 20 August 1858, 2:3.
2Captain Garrett could not be positively identified.
3Stephen A. Douglas delivered a public address in Havana on August 13. According to some news reports, Lincoln arrived by boat as Douglas was speaking and a significant portion of the crowd departed Douglas’s address to welcome Lincoln. Lincoln delivered his speech in Havana the next day, August 14.
At the time, Lincoln was running as the Illinois Republican Party’s candidate to replace Douglas, the incumbent, in the U.S. Senate. He and Douglas both canvassed the state throughout the summer and fall of 1858, delivering speeches in support of candidates for the Illinois General Assembly in their respective parties. At the time, members of the General Assembly voted for and elected the state’s representatives in the U.S. Senate; therefore, the races for the Illinois House of Representatives and Illinois Senate were highly relevant to the outcome of the state’s race for the U.S. Senate seat. See the 1858 Illinois Republican Convention.
Throughout the 1858 campaign season, Douglas devoted significant attention to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Scott v. Sandford, popularly known as the Dred Scott decision. He criticized Lincoln and other Republicans for their outrage over the decision. Lincoln addressed the court’s ruling from the day the Republican Party nominated him as its candidate for the U.S. Senate—in his famous “House Divided” speech. He also asserted throughout the campaign of 1858, including during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, that the Dred Scott decision signaled a desire on the part of pro-slavery Democrats to nationalize slavery.
Daily Illinois State Register (Springfield), 21 July 1858, 2:1; Daily Illinois State Journal (Springfield), 20 August 1858, 2:2-3; The Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, 13 August 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-08-13; 14 August 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-08-14; Chicago Daily Press and Tribune (IL), 20 August 1858, 2:3-4; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008), 1:458; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858,” The Journal of American History 94 (September 2007), 392-94; David Herbert Donald, Lincoln (New York: Touchstone, 1995), 207-9; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Fragment of A House Divided Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois.
4During the summer and fall of 1858, Douglas persistently utilized racism to excite his audiences, claiming that Lincoln and his fellow Republicans were abolitionists who favored political as well as social equality for African Americans, including “amalgamation” of the races through interracial marriage. These were charges Lincoln routinely denied. During the first Lincoln-Douglas Debate, for instance, he asserted that although he believed the Declaration of Independence applied to all men—rather than just white men—he did not favor full social and political equality between the races, nor did he intend to abolish slavery. One of his most renowned counters to Douglas’s accusations regarding amalgamation and interracial marriage was his statement, “I protest, now and forever, against that counterfeit logic which presumes that because I did not want a negro woman for a slave, I do necessarily want her for a wife.”
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:439-41, 468, 501, 506, 510-11; Daily Illinois State Register (Springfield), 19 July 1858, 2:4-6, 3:1-5; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois.
5At the outbreak of the Black Hawk War, Lincoln volunteered for the Illinois State Militia. On April 21, 1832, Lincoln and other men from the New Salem, Illinois, area were mustered into a company in the 4th Regiment of Illinois Mounted Volunteers, and the members of the company elected Lincoln as their captain. When his month of service ended, Lincoln reenlisted twice, for twenty and thirty days respectively, serving as a private both times. He was finally discharged on July 10, 1832.
Muster Roll of Abraham Lincoln's Company of Mounted Volunteers; Muster Roll of Captain Elijah Iles' Company of Mounted Volunteers; Muster Roll of Captain Jacob M. Early's Company of Mounted Volunteers; Ellen M. Whitney, comp., The Black Hawk War, 1831-1832: Illinois Volunteers, vol. 35 of Collections of the Illinois State Historical Library (Springfield: Illinois State Historical Library, 1970), 1:176-78, 227-30, 544-46.
6Douglas delivered an address in Bloomington, Illinois, on July 16. Lincoln was present. According to newspaper reports, after Douglas finished speaking some members of the audience called for Lincoln to speak. Lincoln reportedly told the crowd that since the gathering was organized specifically for Douglas, “it would be improper for me to address it.” Lincoln did not deliver an address in Bloomington until September 4.
Douglas spoke in Clinton, Illinois, on July 27. Lincoln was present and delivered an address at the Clinton courthouse later than evening. For a time, Lincoln had followed Douglas on the campaign trail, delivering speeches either later in the evening after Douglas finished, or the next day. This posed challenges, however, as many spectators were unwilling to devote long hours or days to campaign events. Democrats also attacked Lincoln as “desperate” for following in Douglas’s footsteps. On July 24, Lincoln challenged Douglas to a series of formal debates. Douglas agreed, and these became the Lincoln-Douglas Debates.
When Douglas gave his August 13 speech in Havana, he responded angrily to Lincoln’s accusation that he was part of a pro-slavery conspiracy to nationalize slavery and to Lyman Trumbull’s criticism of him as a hypocrite for opposing the Lecompton Constitution. Douglas called both Lincoln and Trumbull “liars” and “wretches,” among other things.
Daily Illinois State Register (Springfield), 15 July 1858, 2:2; 30 July 1858, 2:1-2; Report of Remarks at Bloomington, Illinois; Report of Remarks at Bloomington, Illinois; The Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, 27 July 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-07-27; 4 September 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-09-04; Report of Speech at Bloomington, Illinois; Report of Speech at Clinton, Illinois; Abraham Lincoln to Stephen A. Douglas; Abraham Lincoln to Stephen A. Douglas; Stephen A. Douglas to Abraham Lincoln; Stephen A. Douglas to Abraham Lincoln; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:476-77, 483-85; Galena Daily Advertiser (IL), 23 August 1858, 2:3.
7Lincoln’s fellow Republican William Kellogg was the incumbent member of the U.S. House of Representatives in the Fourth Congressional District of Illinois, which included Mason County. He delivered an address in Havana immediately after Lincoln.
Howard W. Allen and Vincent A. Lacey, eds., Illinois Elections, 1818-1990 (Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992), 10-11, 142; Daily Illinois State Journal (Springfield), 20 August 1858, 2:2-3.
8Copies of Douglas’s August 13 speech in Havana are not known to be extant. Newspaper coverage of his remarks do not mention Douglas offering to fight or joking about fighting Lincoln. A correspondent for the Daily Illinois State Journal noted, however, that during his speech Douglas was “in a great rage” and “almost driven to the fighting point” regarding Lincoln and Trumbull both attacking him on the campaign trail. The correspondent also noted that “a noble Celt among his auditors even offered to do the job for him.”
Galena Daily Advertiser (IL), 23 August 1858, 2:3; Chicago Daily Press and Tribune (IL), 20 August 1858, 2:4; Daily Illinois State Journal (Springfield), 20 August 1858, 2:2; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:476-77.
9“Springfield platforms” is a reference to separate political platforms created by the Democratic and Republican parties during state conventions that each party held in Springfield, Illinois, in 1858. The Democratic Party held its official state convention in Springfield on April 21. Tensions were high within the party due to President James Buchanan’s recent support of the Lecompton Constitution and Douglas’s denunciation of the constitution as well as Buchanan. Pro-Buchanan delegates bolted the April convention and held their own convention on June 9, during which they strongly denounced Douglas. The Republican Party held its 1858 convention in Springfield on June 16.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:454-55, 457; Daily Illinois State Journal (Springfield), 10 June 1858, 2:2-5.
10During the 1858 campaign, Trumbull left Washington, DC, to travel Illinois and deliver public speeches in support of Republican candidates throughout the state. At the time, he was more well known than Lincoln and was considered a more able speaker, so Republicans were grateful for his efforts on behalf of the party. Douglas often criticized Trumbull, a former Democrat, for allying with the Republicans in general and for aiding Lincoln specifically. One of Douglas’s claims was that Lincoln and Trumbull were conspiring to make both the Democratic and the Republican parties abolitionist parties.
Trumbull delivered a speech in Chicago, Illinois, on August 7 in which he criticized pro-slavery forces, the Democratic Party, and Douglas for the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, efforts to pass the Lecompton Constitution, the Dred Scott decision, and increased public expenditures. He also outlined the Republican Party’s proposed solutions to these issues.
David Herbert Donald, Lincoln, 219-20; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:476-77; Galena Daily Advertiser (IL), 23 August 1858, 2:3; Chicago Daily Press and Tribune (IL), 9 August 1858, 1:2-8; 20 August 1858, 2:4; Daily Illinois State Journal (Springfield), 20 August 1858, 2:2.
11According to the 1848 Illinois Constitution, members of the Illinois General Assembly were elected once every two years. Those state representatives then elected Illinois’s representatives in the U.S. Senate. Per the United States Constitution, U.S. senators serve terms of six years, but their elections are staggered so that one-third of the Senate seats are up for election every two years. Since Trumbull won election to the U.S. Senate in 1855, he was up for reelection in 1861.
Ill. Const. of 1848, art. 3, § 2; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858,” 392; U.S. Const. art. I, § 3; Illinois Senate Journal. 1855. 19th G. A., 255.
12When Trumbull came up for reelection to the U.S. Senate in 1861, he only faced one Democratic rival: Orlando B. Ficklin. Trumbull defeated Ficklin.
Ralph J. Roske, His Own Counsel: The Life and Times of Lyman Trumbull (Reno: University of Nevada Press, 1979), 58, 60; Biographical Directory of the American Congress 1774-1996 (Alexandria, VA: CQ Staff Directories, 1997), 168, 1965.
13It was during his aforementioned House Divided speech that Lincoln first articulated and explicated his argument that pro-slavery forces were conspiring to nationalize slavery—whether as “the result of preconcert” or not.
Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:459-60; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Fragment of A House Divided Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois.
14Lincoln gave speeches in Bath, Illinois, on Monday, August 16, and in Lewiston, Illinois, on Tuesday, August 17.
The Lincoln Log: A Daily Chronology of the Life of Abraham Lincoln, 16 August 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-08-16; 17 August 1858, https://www.thelincolnlog.org/Results.aspx?type=CalendarDay&day=1858-08-17.
15In Illinois’s local elections of 1858, Kellogg won 52.8 percent of the vote and defeated Democrat James W. Davidson, who received 45.7 percent. Although Kellogg won the election, Davidson garnered a larger share of the vote in Mason County.
In the local elections as a whole, Republicans won a majority of all votes cast in the state, but pro-Douglas Democrats retained control of the Illinois General Assembly and Douglas won reelection to the U.S. Senate. Through the campaign, however, and in particular through his participation in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, Lincoln gained recognition and respect within the national Republican Party.
Howard W. Allen and Vincent A. Lacey, eds., Illinois Elections, 1818-1990, 11, 142; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:556-57; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas, and the Political Landscape of 1858,” 414.

Printed Document, 1 page(s), Chicago Daily Press and Tribune , (Chicago, IL) , 20 August 1858, 2:3. .