Fragment of a Speech on Slavery, [July - October 1858]1
But there is a larger issue than the mere question of whether the spread of negro
slavery shall or shall not be prohibited by congress- That larger issue is stated by the Richmond Enquirer, a Buchanan paper in the South, in the language I now read–
It is also stated by the New-York Day-Book, a Buchanan paper in the North, in this language:
And, in relation to indigent white children, the same Northern paper says:2
In support of the Nebraska bill, on it's first discussion in the Senate, Senator Petit of Indiana, declared the equality of men, as asserted in our Declaration of Independence, to
be a "self evident lie"3
In his numerous speeches, now being made in Illinois, Senator Douglas regularly argues against the doctrine of the equality of men; and while he does not
draw the conclusion that the superiors ought to enslave the inferiors, he evidently wishes his hearers to draw that conclusion– He shirks the responsibility
of pulling the house down, but he digs under it, that it may fall of it's own weight–
Now, it is impossible to not see that these newspapers, and Senators, are laboring
at a common object; and in so doing, are truly representing the controling sentiment of their party–
It is equally impossible to not see that that common object is, to subvert, in the
public mind, and in practical administration, our old and only standard of free-government,
that "all men are created equal" and to substitute for it, some different standard– What that substitute is to be
is not difficult to perceive– It is to deny the equality of men; and to assert to the natural, moral, and religious right of one class to enslave another– Whether
we shall cling to the4 . . .
1Abraham Lincoln wrote this fragment, but did not date it.
In editing Lincoln’s papers, his secretaries John G. Nicolay and John M. Hay assigned this undated fragment a date of October 1, 1858, without offering a rationale.
Roy P. Basler, editor of The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, retained this date “for want of evidence to the contrary.” The content of this fragment—specifically
Lincoln’s focus on the national consequences of rejecting a fundamental equality among
men—provides some indication of the date he wrote it.
Lincoln ran in the 1858 Federal Election as the Republican Party’s candidate to supplant Democratic incumbent Stephen A. Douglas in the U.S. Senate. He devoted significant time and
energy to the topic of equality during a July 10 speech in Chicago, Illinois. When he spoke in Springfield, Illinois, on July 17, Lincoln noted that Douglas was misrepresenting his remarks about equality
as articulated in the Declaration of Independence and claiming that Lincoln favored
social and political equality between the races. On October 16, the Daily Illinois State Journal published excerpts from both the Richmond Enquirer and the New York Day-Book advocating slavery as both natural and necessary in human society—regardless of race.
Lincoln may have used these excerpts in his composition of this fragment, or the Daily Illinois State Journal may have printed them after he delivered a public address referencing these papers’
assertions. It is therefore possible that Lincoln wrote this fragment anytime between
July and October 1858. Given that Lincoln honed his arguments regarding the fundamental,
national implications of Douglas’s and others’ indifference to the moral and social
consequences of slavery over the course of the campaign of 1858, he most likely wrote this fragment between mid-September and mid-October 1858. The
editors provide the more generous date range of July to October 1858 for this fragment
to acknowledge the ambiguities inherent in dating the item.
Other fragments and notes written by Lincoln and thought to be potentially related
to his preparations for the Lincoln-Douglas Debates, as part of the 1858 campaign, include: Definition of Democracy; Fragment of Notes for Debates; Fragment of Notes for Speeches; Notes for the Debate at Jonesboro, Illinois; Fragment of Notes on Pro-slavery Theology; Fragment on the Struggle Against Slavery.
John G. Nicolay and John Hay, eds., Complete Works of Abraham Lincoln, new and enlarged ed. (New York: Francis D. Tandy, 1905), 4:200-1; Roy P. Basler,
ed., The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1953), 3:205; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Report of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Daily Illinois State Journal (Springfield), 16 October 1858, 2:2; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008), 1:458, 528.
2Since Lincoln did not record the excerpts from the Richmond Enquirer or the New York Day-Book that he references above, it is not possible to know for certain what quotations
he used from each paper. However, context from the remainder of this speech fragment
indicates that the excerpts most likely related to debates over whether slavery was
morally justifiable and how it fit within the nation’s founding principles of freedom
and equality. This is a topic Lincoln sparred with Douglas over throughout the campaign
of 1858.
Lincoln referenced the Richmond Enquirer in speeches in 1856, so he was aware of and reading the paper at least as early as
then. Lyman Trumbull wrote Lincoln on September 14, 1858 pointing Lincoln to an article in the September 10
issue of the Richmond Enquirer that was related to Douglas’s arguments during the debate at Freeport, Illinois. This article, however, focused largely on whether or not the U.S. Congress could
pass legislation protecting slavery in the territories; therefore, it does not fit
with Lincoln’s assertion, at the beginning of this fragment, that he would address
a “larger issue” than whether or not Congress could prohibit the expansion of slavery.
Summary of Speech at Monticello, Illinois; Report of Speech at Carlinville, Illinois; Report of Speech at Bloomington, Illinois; Report of Speech at Edwardsville, Illinois; Summary of Speech at Greenville, Illinois; Third Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Jonesboro, Illinois; Third Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Jonesboro, Illinois; Third Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Jonesboro, Illinois; Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois; Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois; Fourth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Charleston, Illinois; Report of Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan; Report of Speech at a Republican Banquet, Chicago, Illinois; Richmond Enquirer (VA), 10 September 1858, 2:1.
3This is a reference to a key part of a speech that John Pettit of Indiana gave in
the U.S. Senate during that body’s debate of the Kansas-Nebraska Act. Pettit had argued that, in crafting the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson had never intended the phrase “all men are created equal” to apply to slaves. In
a play upon Jefferson’s concept of self-evident truths, Pettit declared the notion
a “self-evident lie,” asserting that “it is not true that even all persons of the
same race are created equal.”
Lincoln referenced Pettit’s remarks in at least one letter and in multiple speeches
he gave several years prior to the campaign of 1858. He also discussed them during
the seventh Lincoln-Douglas Debate.
Cong. Globe, 33rd Cong., 1st Sess., Appendix, 214 (1854); Report of Speech at Peoria, Illinois; Summary of Speech at Chicago, Illinois; Abraham Lincoln to George Robertson; Report of Speech at Petersburg, Illinois; Seventh Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Alton, Illinois; Seventh Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Alton, Illinois; Seventh Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Alton, Illinois.
4Lincoln is articulating the continuation of an argument he first made during his so-called
“House Divided” speech, which he delivered upon his acceptance of the Illinois Republican
Party’s nomination of him as their candidate for the U.S. Senate, but also repeated in subsequent speeches
and during the Lincoln-Douglas Debates. He accused Douglas of being part of a larger
Democratic plot or conspiracy to nationalize slavery. He argued that the plot began
with Douglas’s involvement in the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska bill, then was advanced by both the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott case and by President James Buchanan’s call to support the court’s decision. During the debate in Ottawa, Illinois, Lincoln asserted that when Douglas refused to address the moral implications of
slavery and denied the equality of men, he was revealing himself to be of that class
of men whom Henry Clay referred to as determined to “repress all tendencies to liberty and ultimate emancipation”
by snuffing out “the moral lights around us.” In subsequent speeches, Lincoln built
upon these earlier arguments, warning that another Supreme Court ruling that would
build upon the Dred Scott decision and prohibit states from excluding slavery within
their own borders was imminent and that, if Douglas and his political ilk could convince
the nation’s citizens to abandon respect for reason and foundational principles such
as liberty and equality, they would have successfully paved the way for public support
of this expansion of slavery.
In the end, in Illinois’s local elections of 1858, Republicans won a majority of all
votes cast in the state, but pro-Douglas Democrats retained control of the Illinois
General Assembly and Douglas ultimately won reelection to the U.S. Senate. Despite
the loss, Lincoln’s participation in the senate race—and in the Lincoln-Douglas Debates
in particular—propelled him to national prominence and helped him win the presidential contest of 1860.
First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; First Debate with Stephen A. Douglas at Ottawa, Illinois; Michael Burlingame, Abraham Lincoln: A Life, 1:458-61, 492-540, 556-57; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Fragment of A House Divided Speech at Springfield, Illinois; Report of Speech at Springfield, Illinois; David Herbert Donald, Lincoln (New York: Touchstone, 1995), 206-9; Allen C. Guelzo, “Houses Divided: Lincoln, Douglas,
and the Political Landscape of 1858,” The Journal of American History 94 (September 2007), 414.
Handwritten Document, 1 page(s),
Yale University, The Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library (New Haven, CT).